当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

我国非羁押诉讼制度研究

发布时间:2018-05-19 03:39

  本文选题:非羁押诉讼 + 现状 ; 参考:《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:非羁押诉讼制度体现了刑事诉讼保障人权和打击犯罪的双重需要,目前,国际上已确立了非羁押为常态,羁押为例外的刑事诉讼原则。我国2012年新修改的《刑事诉讼法》新增了“尊重和保障人权”的立法宗旨,细化了逮捕条件,加强了羁押必要性审查,为广泛适用非羁押诉讼提供了立法支持。但在司法实践中,仍然存在非羁押性强制措施适用率低、执行困难大、司法机关做法不统一等现象。因此,深入研究在我国推行非羁押诉讼制度,保障犯罪嫌疑人的各项权利仍有十分重要的意义。纵观我国的非羁押诉讼制度,还处于初级阶段,制约非羁押性强制措施适用的因素诸多:立法存在缺陷,“社会危险性”的认定缺乏可操作性;保障非羁押诉讼运行的相关配套措施滞后;执行主体积极性不高;受固有惯性思维的影响等。笔者尝试在分析非羁押诉讼基础理论的基础上,对我国非羁押诉讼的现状和问题进行研究,以国外相关制度为借鉴,以各地方的有益探索经验为参考,特别针对取保候审、监视居住措施适用中的顽疾,着重从基层检察院的视角,探讨如何改进和完善我国非羁押诉讼制度。
[Abstract]:Non-custodial litigation system embodies the dual needs of protecting human rights in criminal proceedings and cracking down on crime. At present, the principle of non-custodial as the normal and detention as the exception has been established in the international community. The new revised Criminal procedure Law of China in 2012 has added the legislative purpose of "respecting and protecting human rights", refined the conditions of arrest, strengthened the examination of the necessity of custody, and provided legislative support for the wide application of non-custodial proceedings. However, in judicial practice, there are still some phenomena, such as low application rate of non-custodial coercive measures, great difficulties in implementation and inconsistent practice of judicial organs. Therefore, it is of great significance to carry out the non-custodial litigation system in our country and to protect the rights of criminal suspects. The system of non-custodial litigation in our country is still in the primary stage. There are many factors restricting the application of non-custodial coercive measures: the defects of legislation and the lack of maneuverability in the identification of "social danger"; The relative measures to guarantee the operation of non-custodial litigation lag behind; the enthusiasm of the subject of execution is not high; it is influenced by the inherent inertia thinking and so on. Based on the analysis of the basic theory of non-custodial litigation, the author attempts to study the current situation and problems of non-custodial litigation in China, taking the relevant foreign systems as reference, and taking the beneficial exploration experience of various places as reference, especially for the purpose of obtaining bail pending trial. From the perspective of the basic procuratorate, this paper probes into how to improve and perfect the non-custodial litigation system in our country.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张桂霞;;非羁押性强制措施中社会支持体系的构建[J];山东警察学院学报;2016年04期

2 金志强;王智;;非羁押性强制措施适用研究[J];法制博览;2016年12期

3 郭冰;;羁押必要性审查制度实践运行审视[J];中国刑事法杂志;2016年02期

4 陈子楠;;论我国审前羁押必要性审查的程序重构[J];铁道警察学院学报;2014年06期

5 贾世民;吴江;周一;陈竞华;;犯罪嫌疑人未羁押状态下的诉讼推进[J];河南社会科学;2014年12期

6 李艳阳;杨爱霖;;我国非羁押诉讼存在的问题及立法完善[J];公民与法(法学版);2014年06期

7 关振海;;捕后羁押必要性审查的基层实践[J];国家检察官学院学报;2013年06期

8 高宛梅;;捕后轻刑判决率高的原因及对策[J];中国检察官;2013年17期

9 房国宾;;保释制度基础比较研究[J];贵州社会科学;2007年03期

10 周伟;邵尔希;;释放还是羁押——扩大适用取保候审的困难与选择[J];现代法学;2007年01期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 樊崇义 ;张书铭;;细化逮捕条件,完善逮捕程序[N];检察日报;2012年



本文编号:1908576

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1908576.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5b5c5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com