隐蔽性信息的诉讼证明价值研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 18:57

本文选题：隐蔽性信息 + 供述可靠性　；参考：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：隐蔽性信息在《办理死刑案件证据规定》中被首次提出，并在侦查审判实践中起到越来越重要的作用，但在理论界有关隐蔽性信息的学术研究非常的少，，这就导致一方面司法机关对其重视不够，另一方面在隐蔽性信息的实际应用中也容易滋生虚假供述。作为隐蔽性信息研究方面的初步尝试，本文是从隐蔽性信息的诉讼证明价值角度进行考察，论证隐蔽性信息的利用在我国的必要性、可能性及其重要意义，同时因隐蔽性信息与美国的亲身知识内涵相当，笔者借鉴美国的利用亲身知识评估供述可靠性的方法，提出利用隐蔽性信息评估供述的可靠性，并尝试构建相关方法和程序。本文第一部分简要介绍了口供补强证据规则，并重点介绍了美国的补强证据规则及其发展，其最新发展为通过亲身知识评估供述的可靠性，引出本文的重点，即利用隐蔽性信息评估供述的可靠性。本文将亲身知识放在中国的语境中，结合《办理死刑案件证据规定》中有关隐蔽性证据的规定，将“亲身知识”用“隐蔽性信息”来表述。本文第二部分论述我国利用隐蔽性信息的必要性，首先梳理了我国的印证证明模式及其不足，然后重点从细节信息的角度，讨论了细节信息能够评估供述的可靠性，同时进一步论证了我国利用隐蔽性信息评估供述可靠性的必要性。本文第三部分从实践和诉讼价值角度论述了我国利用隐蔽性信息意义。即我国实践中已经在利用隐蔽性信息，且隐蔽性信息可以提高言词证据的固定能力。本文第四部分重点探讨我国如何利用隐蔽性信息评估供述可靠性，首先对隐蔽性信息的含义进行了界定，分别讨论如何评估可靠的供述和不可靠的供述，重点论述了在诱供情况下如何确认虚假供述，最后尝试构建我国供述可靠性的司法审查程序和其他程序保障。通过借鉴美国亲身知识的运用，结合我国的刑事诉讼实际，从理论上论述利用隐蔽性信息的必要性，从程序上构建隐蔽性信息的运用方法。
[Abstract]:Concealment information is put forward for the first time in the provision of evidence for handling death penalty cases, and plays a more and more important role in the practice of investigation and trial. However, there is very little academic research on hidden information in the theoretical circle. On the one hand, the judiciary does not pay enough attention to it, on the other hand, it is easy to breed false confession in the practical application of hidden information. As a preliminary attempt in the research of hidden information, this paper investigates the value of litigation proof of hidden information, and demonstrates the necessity, possibility and significance of the use of hidden information in our country. At the same time, because the concealment information is equivalent to the American personal knowledge, the author draws lessons from the American method of using personal knowledge to evaluate the reliability of confession, puts forward the method of using hidden information to evaluate the reliability of confession, and tries to construct the relevant methods and procedures. In the first part of this paper, the rule of corroboration evidence is briefly introduced, and the rule of corroboration evidence and its development in the United States are emphatically introduced. Its latest development is to evaluate the reliability of confession through personal knowledge, which leads to the key points of this paper. That is, using hidden information to evaluate the reliability of confession. This paper puts personal knowledge in the context of China, combined with the provisions on hidden evidence in the provisions of evidence for handling death penalty cases, and expresses "personal knowledge" with "hidden information". The second part of this paper discusses the necessity of using hidden information in our country, firstly combing the proof mode and its shortcomings in our country, and then, from the angle of detail information, discussing that detail information can evaluate the reliability of confession. At the same time, the necessity of using hidden information to evaluate the reliability of confession is further demonstrated. The third part discusses the significance of using hidden information in our country from the angle of practice and litigation value. That is, the hidden information has been used in our practice, and the hidden information can improve the fixed ability of verbal evidence. The fourth part of this paper focuses on how to use hidden information to assess the reliability of confessions. Firstly, the meaning of hidden information is defined, and how to evaluate reliable confessions and unreliable confessions are discussed respectively. This paper focuses on how to confirm false confession in the case of inducement, and finally attempts to construct the judicial review procedure and other procedural safeguards for the reliability of confession in our country. By referring to the application of American personal knowledge and combining the criminal procedure practice of our country, this paper theoretically discusses the necessity of using hidden information, and constructs the application method of hidden information from the procedure.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】