认罪认罚从宽制度的内涵与边界——兼与刑事速裁程序比较

发布时间：2018-05-24 01:22

  本文选题：认罪认罚从宽制度 + 刑事速裁程序　； 参考：《学术交流》2017年08期

【摘要】：2014年6月,全国人大授权两高开展了刑事速裁程序的试点,2016年9月,全国人大又授权两高开展了认罪认罚从宽制度的试点。认罪认罚从宽制度与刑事速裁程序都是国家为了解决轻微刑事案件逐年上升的问题,兼顾司法效率与司法公正,所作出的制度选择。通过对认罪认罚从宽制度的内涵进行界定,进而对认罪认罚从宽制度的边界进行论证,最终对比了认罪认罚程序与刑事速裁程序的异同,明确了二者的关系。内涵和边界是一切制度研究的逻辑起点,认罪认罚制度需要从它的内涵和边界上正确界定,以指导司法实践的运行,并促进制度的完善。
[Abstract]:In June 2014, the National People's Congress authorized two high schools to carry out the pilot of the criminal procedure. In September 2016, the National People's Congress authorized two high schools to carry out the pilot of the plea punishment and leniency system. The plea punishment leniency system and the criminal procedure are all the problems of the state in order to solve the slight criminal cases rising year by year, and take into account the judicial efficiency and judicial justice. Through the definition of the connotations of the plea leniency system and the boundary of the plea leniency system, the differences and similarities between the confession and punishment procedure and the criminal procedure are contrasted, and the relationship between the two is clarified. The connotation and boundary are the logical starting points of the study of all systems, and the system of confession and punishment is required. We should correctly define its connotation and boundary so as to guide the operation of judicial practice and promote the perfection of the system.
【作者单位】： 黑龙江大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“中国革命法制‘从农村到城市’的重大转折研究”(12BFX021)
【分类号】：D925.2
，

本文编号：1927145