论被追诉人的自主性辩护权

发布时间：2018-05-24 01:22

本文选题：自主性辩护权 + 律师辩护权　；参考：《江西财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：被追诉人自主性辩护权作为实现公平正义的基石,对保障被追诉人诉讼权益具有重要作用。但目前我国主要存在立法上对被追诉人自主性辩护权保障不足,被追诉人行使自主性辩护权和律师独立行使辩护权之间存在冲突,自主性辩护权处于虚化状态,欠缺对自主性辩护权的外部保障等现状。造成我国被追诉人自主性辩护权行使困境的现状有诸多原因,主要包括被追诉人“客体化倾向”的司法氛围,自主性辩护权内容缺失,辩护律师的作用也被阻隔,被追诉人自身条件不足以及知悉权与言词证据可靠性之间存在矛盾等原因。从我国“尊重与保障人权”原则,保障被追诉人“辩护者”的诉讼主体地位,实现程序正义,增强裁判的可接受性以及发现案件事实真相的角度,对被追诉人自主性辩护权的保障具有一定的正当性和必要性。然而,保障被追诉人自主性辩护权有效行使仍存在某些消极影响,如诱使被追诉人实施妨碍诉讼的行为,增加司法负担,不当行使自主性辩护权还有可能损害其自身利益。因此,我国应当从以下几方面保障被追诉人自主性辩护权。首先,保障被追诉人的诉讼主体性地位;其次,确立有限度的知悉权,包括建立被追诉人主动会见权、有限阅卷权、调查取证权等制度,保障辩护的有效性;然后,对无辩护律师参与案件中的被追诉人重点保障;再次,避免自主性辩护权的行使妨碍供述的可靠性;最后,协调被追诉人自主性辩护权与律师辩护权的关系,明确律师与被追诉人辩护权的相互独立性,建立被追诉人与辩护律师的协商以及退出机制。
[Abstract]:As the cornerstone of fairness and justice, the right of independent defense plays an important role in protecting the litigant's rights and interests. However, at present, there is a conflict between the right of the accused to exercise the right of independent defense and the independent exercise of the right of counsel, and the right of independent defense is in a virtual state. Lack of external protection of the right to independent defense, and so on. There are many reasons for the dilemma of the right of independent defense of the accused person in our country, including the judicial atmosphere of the accused person's "objectification tendency", the lack of the content of the right of independent defense, and the function of the defense lawyer is also blocked. The accused person's own condition is insufficient and the contradiction between the right of knowledge and the reliability of verbal evidence exists. In view of the principle of "respecting and protecting human rights" in our country, to guarantee the subject status of the accused "defender", to realize procedural justice, to enhance the acceptability of the referee and to find the truth of the case, It has certain legitimacy and necessity to guarantee the right of independent defense. However, there still exist some negative effects on the effective exercise of the right of independent defense of the accused person, such as inducing the accused person to carry out the behavior of obstructing the lawsuit, increasing the judicial burden, and possibly harming his own interests by improper exercise of the right of independent defense. Therefore, our country should guarantee the right of independent defense from the following aspects. Firstly, to protect the litigant's subjective status; secondly, to establish the limited right of knowing, including the right of active meeting, the limited right to read papers, the right to investigate and collect evidence, and so on, to protect the validity of the defense. Third, to avoid the exercise of the right of independent defense to hinder the reliability of the confession; finally, to coordinate the relationship between the right of the accused and the right of counsel to defend. Make clear the mutual independence of the lawyer and the accused person's right of defense, establish the consultation and withdrawal mechanism between the accused and the defense lawyer.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】