仲裁案外人权利救济制度探析

发布时间：2018-05-24 07:17

本文选题：仲裁案外人 + 权利救济　；参考：《贵州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：依据效力相对性原则,他人之间法律关系争议的仲裁裁决效力不会对案外人产生拘束力,也不会对案外人产生不利的影响。但是,由于裁决的对世效力或者是当事人恶意串通通过仲裁侵害案外人的合法权益,因此有必要专门设置一种对仲裁案外人权益的特殊救济机制,即仲裁案外人权利救济制度,其内容包括案外人撤销仲裁裁决之诉和执行中案外人异议。错误裁决出现时,在我国现行法律框架下可以采取一些补救措施,但涉及到救济案外人权利时,这些措施发挥的作用很小。从法理上看,程序正义原理要求赋予仲裁案外人救济权。而且对仲裁案外人的救济只是一种事后性救济程序,案外人并没有实质加入到正在进行的仲裁程序当中,从而保全了仲裁的契约性特点,而且不会削弱仲裁独有合意性、秘密性、快捷性等优势。对于仲裁案外人权利救济,域外国家或地区已有成熟的立法案例。本文重点介绍了法国案外人取消仲裁裁决的异议、澳门地区仲裁裁决无效认定制度、以及日本、德国、韩国的案外人执行异议之诉制度,介绍这些制度的目的是为我国建立完善的仲裁案外人权利救济制度提供参考和借鉴。本文讨论了案外人撤销仲裁裁决之诉制度和执行中案外人异议制度,并讨论如何作出合理的制度安排,使二者充分发挥各自功能,实现有机配合,在不同的阶段保护仲裁案外人的合法权益。
[Abstract]:According to the principle of relativity of validity, the validity of arbitration award in disputes of legal relations between others will not have binding force on the outsiders of the case, nor will it have adverse effects on the outsiders of the case. However, since the validity of the award to the world or the malicious collusion of the parties to infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of the outsiders in the arbitration case, it is necessary to set up a special relief mechanism for the rights and interests of the outsiders in the arbitration case, that is, the relief system of the rights and interests of the outsiders in the arbitration case. Its contents include the action of annulment of arbitration award by the litigant and the objection of the foreign party in the execution of the arbitration award. Some remedial measures can be taken under the current legal framework of our country when the wrong adjudication appears, but when it comes to the rights of the outsiders in the relief case, these measures play a very small role. From the legal point of view, the principle of procedural justice requires the right of relief to arbitration cases. Moreover, the relief to outsiders in arbitration cases is only a kind of ex post relief procedure, and the outsiders have not actually joined in the ongoing arbitration proceedings, thus preserving the contractual characteristics of arbitration and not weakening the unique agreement of arbitration. The advantage of secrecy, quickness, etc. Foreign countries or regions have mature legislative cases to remedy the rights of outsiders in arbitration cases. This paper mainly introduces the objection of the outsider to cancel the arbitration award in France, the system of invalidation of the arbitration award in Macao, and the system of litigation by the foreign party in Japan, Germany and South Korea. The purpose of introducing these systems is to provide reference and reference for the establishment of a perfect remedy system for the rights of outsiders in arbitration cases in our country. This paper discusses the appeal system of annulment of arbitration award and the objection system of the foreign party in the execution of the arbitration award, and discusses how to make reasonable system arrangement to make the two parties give full play to their respective functions and realize the organic cooperation. To protect the legitimate rights and interests of outsiders in arbitration cases at different stages.
【学位授予单位】：贵州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.7

【相似文献】