当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

刑事鉴定人出庭作证制度研究

发布时间:2018-05-25 09:05

  本文选题:刑事鉴定人 + 出庭作证 ; 参考:《湖南师范大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:鉴定意见是很多刑事案件中的重要证据。近年,我国发生的刑事错案中,因鉴定原因导致的错案占有很大一部分,刑事鉴定人极少出庭成为其中不可推却的原因。2012年刑事诉讼法修改,意图完善刑事鉴定人出庭制度,但经笔者分析,这次修改虽然较以前的立法有所改进,但仍然没有很好地解决鉴定人出庭率极低的问题。文章分四个部分,第一部分,就刑事鉴定人出庭作证制度的相关概念进行界定,分析了刑事鉴定制度的发展变革,指出刑事鉴定人出庭作证的价值和功能。第二部分,结合我国新修订的刑事诉讼法及其《解释》,分析了我国当前刑事鉴定人出庭作证制度的立法现状和司法现状,以及刑事鉴定人出庭作证制度面临困境的主要原因。第三部分,对两大法系鉴定人出庭作证制度进行比较考察后,提出了我国刑事鉴定人出庭作证制度值得借鉴之处。第四部分,结合我国国情和司法实践,提出从刑事鉴定人出庭作证的程序规则、保障机制、责任追究机制等方面完善我国的刑事鉴定人出庭作证制度。
[Abstract]:Expert opinions are important evidence in many criminal cases. In recent years, in the cases of criminal error occurring in our country, the wrong cases caused by the reasons of identification account for a large part, and rarely appearing in court of criminal connoisseurs becomes the inescapable reason. In 2012, the Criminal procedure Law was amended with the intention of perfecting the system of criminal appraisers appearing in court. However, through the author's analysis, although this amendment has some improvement over the previous legislation, it still does not solve the problem of the extremely low attendance rate of experts. The article is divided into four parts. In the first part, the author defines the relevant concepts of the system of criminal appraiser appearing in court, analyzes the development and transformation of the system of criminal identification, and points out the value and function of the criminal expert in court. The second part, combined with the newly revised Criminal procedure Law and its explanation, analyzes the current legislative and judicial status of the present system of criminal appraiser appearing in court in our country, and the main reasons why the system of criminal connoisseur appearing in court is facing difficulties. The third part, after the comparative investigation of the two legal system, the author points out that the system of criminal connoisseur testifying in court in our country should be used for reference. The fourth part, combined with our country's national conditions and judicial practice, puts forward the perfection of our country's criminal connoisseur testifying system in the aspects of procedure rule, safeguard mechanism, responsibility investigation mechanism and so on.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 顾永忠;;我国刑事辩护制度的改革与再完善[J];人民检察;2008年01期

2 邹积超;;浅论鉴定人的法庭位置[J];中国司法鉴定;2010年01期

3 张玉镶;对司法鉴定学几个概念的再思考[J];中外法学;1997年03期

4 陈瑞华;;增列权利还是加强救济?——简论刑事审判前程序中的辩护问题[J];环球法律评论;2006年05期



本文编号:1932867

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1932867.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f1fa3***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com