庭审中心视域下的民事审前准备程序研究

发布时间：2018-05-27 10:37

本文选题：庭审中心 + 审前准备程序　；参考：《中国法学》2017年06期

【摘要】：从1982年民事诉讼法到2012年民事诉讼法,我国审前准备程序的改革经历了以公正为名的虚化到以效率为指向的弱化,尽管在外观上逐渐呈现出独立化样态,但却深陷公正与效率的矛盾而致功能丧失。从充实庭审的现实需要出发,有必要对我国审前准备程序进行重构。从庭审中心论立场而言,我国应当建构期日型审前准备程序,而非现行两阶段分置式的审前准备程序。因此,完善我国审前准备程序的核心内容,绝非止于现有认识上的重置法官与当事人的权限配置关系,赋予当事人争点决定权并限缩法官权限即可,而是要遵循当事人事实主张的规制原理,以有理性评价为指针整理、限缩、深化并确认双方当事人的争议焦点。藉此,庭审始能高效地实施集中证据调查以发现真实。
[Abstract]:From 1982 civil procedure law to 2012 civil procedure law, the reform of the pretrial preparation procedure in our country has experienced the weakening of efficiency in the name of justice, although the appearance of the reform has gradually appeared to be independent. But the contradiction between justice and efficiency results in the loss of function. It is necessary to reconstruct the pretrial preparation procedure of our country in order to enrich the actual needs of the trial. From the point of view of trial center theory, our country should construct the Japanese pretrial preparation procedure, rather than the current two-stage separate pretrial preparation procedure. Therefore, to perfect the core content of the pretrial preparation procedure in China is not to reset the relationship between the judge and the party in the present understanding, and to give the parties the right to decide the point of contention and limit the jurisdiction of the judge. Instead, we should follow the principle of regulation advocated by the parties, organize it with rational evaluation as the guide, limit the limitation, deepen and confirm the dispute focus of both parties. In this way, the trial can efficiently carry out centralized evidence investigation to discover the truth.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金“迈向制度理性的民事庭审阶段化构造研究”(项目批准号:15XFX012)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】