谦抑与能动:民事审判权运行之相对限度

发布时间：2018-05-27 10:45

本文选题：民事审判权 + 谦抑　；参考：《河北法学》2013年02期

【摘要】：民事审判权具备谦抑性与能动性两种属性。程序启动阶段审判权之谦抑性要求法院应尊重当事人对诉权、诉讼标的及程序的选择权,而能动性则要求法院对诉权行使作必要审查,对诉权滥用作必要规制,对诉讼要件作必要限定。诉讼推进阶段审判权之谦抑性要求法院应遵循权责统一、司法中立和程序理性原则,而能动性则要求法院要审查当事人的适格性,要衡平双方力量差异,要控制诉讼时空的推移,要强化公共利益的维护。案件裁判阶段审判权之谦抑性要求法院裁判不得干预立法权,不得超出诉请范围,不得违反既判力原则,不得主动启动执行程序,而能动性则要求法院能动运用办案技巧以做到案结事了,能动解决个案纠纷以引导政策制定,能动解释法律以弥补技术漏洞。
[Abstract]:Civil jurisdiction has two attributes: modesty and initiative. The modesty of judicial power at the beginning of the procedure requires the court to respect the parties' right of action, the object of action and the choice of procedure, while the initiative requires the court to make the necessary examination on the exercise of the right of action and to regulate the abuse of the right of action. Make necessary limitations on the elements of the proceedings. The modesty of the judicial power in the proceeding stage requires the court to follow the principles of unity of power and responsibility, judicial neutrality and procedural rationality, while the initiative requires the court to examine the suitability of the parties and to balance the differences between the two parties. We should control the time and space of litigation and strengthen the maintenance of public interest. The modest nature of the judicial power in the adjudication stage of a case requires that the court should not interfere with the legislative power, shall not exceed the scope of the appeal, shall not violate the principle of res judicata, and shall not initiate the execution procedure on its own initiative. But the initiative requires the court to use the case handling technique to complete the case, to solve the case dispute to guide the policy formulation, to interpret the law to make up the technical loophole.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;安阳师范学院;
【基金】：河南省哲学社会科学规划课题《司法便民、以讼息讼——马锡五审判方式的当代价值研究》(2011FFX010)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】