论我国民事诉讼和解制度的完善
发布时间:2018-05-28 12:03
本文选题:民事诉讼和解 + 当事人合意 ; 参考:《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:在市场经济逐步发展的过程中,民事纠纷的数量急剧增加,此外,民众的法律意识与权利诉求更是愈发强烈。因此,当事人的合意也就显得更加重要,建立与之相适应的诉讼和解制度也就极为重要。 民事诉讼和解制度强调合意解决纠纷,无论在英美法系国家还是大陆法系国家的纠纷解决过程中,都发挥着不可替代的积极功能。纵观我国整个民事诉讼法律体系,关于民事诉讼和解的规定是少之又少。我国《民事诉讼法》仅在第50条规定,当事人可自行和解,相关司法解释中相关内容的规范同样十分粗略;在司法实践当中,由于缺少相关法律规范的规制,民事诉讼和解制度缺乏可操作性,对民事诉讼和解的实现产生了极大的制约。 本文即从民事诉讼和解制度理论问题的探讨入手,结合域外相关经验,总结提出笔者观点,希望可以为我国建立民事诉讼和解制度尽绵薄之力。 具体言之,本文正文共分为四个部分:第一部分,介绍了民事诉讼和解制度的基本理论,这些基础理论的辨析都为下文梳理了思路,奠定了基础;第二部分,域外相关制度的考察;第三部分,阐述我国民事诉讼和解制度的现状,并分析其之所以不完善的制度性内因;最后重点论述了关于我国诉讼审判和解制度完善的建议:应该重在尊重当事人的意思自治;“和解协议书”的“诉讼契约”本质属性应被重视。此外,为了保证当事人处分权的事实上的行使,还需明确诉讼审判中和解的法律效力、完善和解协议瑕疵的救济途径、其他配套相关制度的完善等等。
[Abstract]:In the process of the development of market economy, the number of civil disputes increases sharply, in addition, the people's legal consciousness and right demand are more and more intense. Therefore, the agreement of the parties is more important, and it is extremely important to establish the corresponding litigation settlement system. The settlement system of civil action emphasizes the consensual settlement of disputes, which plays an irreplaceable positive role in the process of dispute settlement in both Anglo-American and continental law countries. Throughout the legal system of civil litigation in our country, there are very few provisions on the settlement of civil proceedings. The Civil procedure Law of our country only stipulates in Article 50 that the parties concerned may reconcile themselves, and the relevant contents of the relevant judicial interpretation are also very rough; in judicial practice, due to the lack of the regulation of relevant legal norms, The lack of maneuverability of the civil litigation reconciliation system has greatly restricted the realization of the civil litigation reconciliation. This article begins with the discussion of the theory of the settlement system of civil action, combining with the relevant experience of foreign countries, summarizes and puts forward the author's viewpoint, hoping that it can contribute to the establishment of the system of reconciliation of civil action in our country. Specifically, the text of this paper is divided into four parts: the first part, introduced the basic theory of civil litigation reconciliation system, the discrimination of these basic theories for the following combing ideas, laid the foundation; the second part, The third part expounds the present situation of the reconciliation system of civil action in China, and analyzes the internal causes of its imperfection. In the end, the author puts emphasis on the suggestions of perfecting the system of litigation trial and reconciliation in our country: the emphasis should be placed on respecting the autonomy of the parties' will, and the essential attribute of the "litigation contract" of the "settlement agreement" should be attached importance to. In addition, in order to ensure the parties'de facto exercise of the right of disposition, it is also necessary to clarify the legal effect of reconciliation in litigation, to improve the remedies for the defects of the settlement agreement, and to improve other supporting related systems, and so on.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 齐树洁;;台湾地区民事诉讼制度改革述评[J];法治研究;2011年06期
,本文编号:1946628
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1946628.html