论我国刑事速裁程序的制度构建

发布时间：2018-05-29 01:35

本文选题：轻微刑事案件 + 速裁程序　；参考：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来伴随着我国经济的迅速发展和社会的不断转型,我国的犯罪率一直稳高不下且有逐年增长的趋势(1)。特别是扒窃、醉驾等违法行为的入刑,加剧了案多人少的矛盾。一方面,公检法三机关的办案力量缓慢增加,而轻微刑事案件的数量却快速增长,另一方面,新刑诉法使得诉讼程序的操作更加规范和严格,难以同时兼具公正与效率,而我国目前的诉讼程序案件繁简分流不明显。对此,两高(最高法、最高检)在全国人大常委会的授权下,在全国的十八个城市进行速裁程序的试点工作。紧接着两高两部共同颁布《关于在部分地区开展刑事案件速裁程序试点工作的办法》(下文称《办法》),刑事速裁程序应运而生。在该程序试点两年后,2016年11月,两高三部共同颁布《关于在部分地区开展刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的办法》(下文称《试点办法》),在原有试点基础上继续推行速裁程序。2017年3月,第十二届全国人民代表大会第五次会议召开,两高在会上提出积极推进刑事速裁程序改革,实现案件繁简分流,进一步提高诉讼效率。本文运用实证分析、理论研究的方法剖析我国正在试点的刑事速裁程序,一共包括四个部分。第一部分由典型案例引出刑事速裁程序,通过案例探析其在我国当前的司法体制下产生的积极作用以及存在的问题。第二部分通过对刑事速裁程序的全面分析,探讨其与刑事简易程序的相同点和不同点,证明刑事速裁程序是一种不同于刑事简易程序的新型诉讼程序。第三部分通过考察大陆法系国家和英美法系国家不同类型的刑事速裁程序,在比较和分析各国有益经验的基础上建立符合我国国情的刑事速裁程序。第四部分通过列举部分试点城市的实践情况,分析介绍各个城市的实践特色,在此基础上对构建我国的刑事速裁程序提出一些具体构想。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of our economy and the continuous transformation of society, the crime rate of our country has been stable and high and has a trend of increasing year by year. In particular, pickpocketing, drunk driving and other illegal acts of punishment, exacerbated the conflict between more and less cases. On the one hand, the power of handling cases by the three organs of the Public Security Bureau, the Procuratorate and the Court has increased slowly, while the number of minor criminal cases has increased rapidly. On the other hand, the new Criminal procedure Law has made the operation of the proceedings more standardized and rigorous, and it is difficult to simultaneously have justice and efficiency. But our country's current lawsuit procedure case complex diversion is not obvious. In this regard, under the authorization of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress (NPC standing Committee), the Supreme people's Congress (Supreme Law, Supreme Procuratorate) carried out the pilot work of the expedited adjudication procedure in 18 cities across the country. Then the two ministries jointly promulgate "the method of developing the trial work of the criminal case quick adjudication procedure in some regions" (hereinafter called "the method >), the criminal quick adjudication procedure arises at the historic moment." Two years after the process was piloted, in November 2016, The two high and third ministries jointly promulgated the measures on the pilot work on the system of lenient admission and punishment in criminal cases in some regions (hereinafter referred to as the "pilot measures"), and continued to carry out the expedited adjudication procedure on the basis of the original pilot. March 2017, The Fifth session of the Twelfth National people's Congress was held at which the two high levels proposed to actively promote the reform of criminal adjudication procedures, to realize the division of cases and to further improve the efficiency of litigation. This article uses the empirical analysis, the theoretical research method to analyze our country is in the pilot criminal quick adjudication procedure, altogether includes four parts. In the first part, the criminal quick adjudication procedure is introduced from typical cases, and the positive role and existing problems of the criminal adjudication procedure under the current judicial system of our country are analyzed through the cases. The second part discusses the similarities and differences between the criminal summary procedure and the criminal summary procedure, and proves that the criminal quick adjudication procedure is a new type of litigation procedure different from the criminal summary procedure. In the third part, by investigating the different types of criminal quick adjudication procedures in civil law countries and common law countries, the author establishes the criminal quick adjudication procedure in accordance with the national conditions of our country on the basis of comparing and analyzing the beneficial experiences of various countries. The fourth part through enumerates the practice situation of some pilot cities, analyzes and introduces the practice characteristics of each city, on the basis of this, puts forward some concrete ideas to construct our country's criminal quick adjudication procedure.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】