论民事诉讼中当事人之主观心理状态的查明——以程序性争议的处理为分析对象

发布时间：2018-05-29 06:40

本文选题：民事程序性争议 + 主观心理状态　；参考：《法学论坛》2017年05期

【摘要】：当事人实施某项诉讼行为时的主观心理状态是民事诉讼中解决部分程序性争议的关键和难点之所在。鉴于当事人主观心理状态的内在性、复杂性和难以直接判断性,常规的证明方法已难以在此类纠纷的解决过程中发挥有效作用,对当事人在民事诉讼中主观心理状态的查明具有区别于对一般案件事实查明的特殊性,为此创设符合其产生原因和表现规律的新型证明方法是有效处理该类纠纷的方案之所在。在当事人主张自己的主观意思表示受到法院审判行为的不正当干预时,其应首先对审判行为不正当进行顺向疏明,然后再由法院对审判行为的正当性进行逆向证明。在司法机关依职权查明当事人之间是否存在恶意串通时,其应在一定的证明标准之下,根据相关行为的间接证据对当事人的主观心理状态进行推定。
[Abstract]:The subjective state of mind is the key and difficulty in resolving some procedural disputes in civil litigation. In view of the inherent nature of the subjective psychological state of the parties concerned, the complexity and the difficulty of judging directly, the conventional methods of proof have been difficult to play an effective role in the settlement of such disputes. The identification of the subjective psychological state of the parties in civil proceedings is different from that of the facts of a general case. Therefore, the creation of a new method of proof which accords with the causes and performance rules of the dispute is the solution to deal with the dispute effectively. When the parties claim that their subjective intention is unjustly interfered by the court's trial behavior, they should first make the trial improper in the following direction, and then the court should prove the justice of the trial act in reverse. When the judicial organs find out whether there is malicious collusion between the parties according to their functions, they should infer the subjective psychological state of the parties according to the indirect evidence of the relevant acts under a certain standard of proof.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院;
【基金】：中国政法大学《刑民交叉案件程序问题研究》青年教师学术创新团队项目资助,系司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目中青年课题《对民事违法审判行为的检察监督》(15SFB3020)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】