论刑事自辩权
发布时间:2018-05-29 06:34
本文选题:自辩权 + 会见权 ; 参考:《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:刑事被追诉人辩护权的有效实施,更多的是被委托在辩护人身上。作为刑事诉讼程序的主角,其要求主动性辩护的天性更多的被赋予他人,被动会见、无主动性阅卷、调查取证,其自主性辩护权的有效实施往往依托于辩护人这一角色,导致其与辩护人之间无法合一的与控方处于平等对抗地位,出现“断裂的辩护”,出现法庭上辩方处于较为弱势的不利形势,而这些情形实质上不利于被追诉人生命尊严、人身自由权的保障,更不利于其自辩权的有效实现,同时被追诉人人身财产权的侵犯又能否作为其自被采取强制措施之日起公、检、法程序违法情形的辩护点。这些问题的研究均离不开将辩护权不仅从字面形式上归位于被追诉人这一元主体,更应从实质上有效的保障被追诉人刑事自辩权的实施,保障被追诉人要求会见的主动性,要求阅卷的需要,要求调查取证的权利,同时应考虑到如果赋予被追诉人太多程序上的权利,是否不利于案件的查明,不利于案件的最终审判,又如何定位被追诉人与辩护人之间的关系,这一切需要从立法和司法层面上保障被追诉人自辩权的有效实现,同时离不开法律共同体司法理念与司法程序的认知与应用,更离不开社会生活中每个人对法律条文背后的理解,而这一切都将有利于国家司法公正更好的发展,有利于保障刑事被追诉人自辩权的实质展开及对其生命、尊严捍卫的尊重。
[Abstract]:The effective implementation of the defense right of the criminal prosecution is more entrusted to the defender. As the protagonist of the criminal procedure, its nature of asking for active defense is more entrusted to others, passive interview, no active marking, investigation and evidence collection, and its effective implementation of the right to independent defense often depends on the role of the defender. As a result, it is in an equal position of confrontation with the prosecution that cannot be United with the defender, there is a "broken defense", and the unfavorable situation of the defense in the court is relatively weak, and these circumstances are actually not conducive to the human dignity of the person being prosecuted. The protection of the right to personal liberty is not conducive to the effective realization of their right to defend themselves. At the same time, whether the infringements of the personal property rights of the accused person can be used as a defense point for the illegal situation of public, procuratorial and legal procedures since the date of taking compulsory measures. The research of these problems is inseparable from the fact that the right of defense should not only be placed literally in the subject of prosecution, but also effectively protect the implementation of the accused person's right of criminal self-defense, and ensure the initiative of the accused person to meet with the accused person. The need to request a file review and the right to investigate and obtain evidence, taking into account whether the granting of too many procedural rights to the accused is not conducive to the identification of the case and to the final trial of the case, And how to locate the relationship between the accused and the defender, all of which need to ensure the effective realization of the accused person's right of self-defense from the legislative and judicial levels, and at the same time, it is inseparable from the cognition and application of the judicial concept and judicial procedure of the legal community. Moreover, it is necessary for everyone in the social life to understand the legal provisions, which will be conducive to the better development of national judicial justice, to the protection of the substantive development of the criminal prosecution's right to defend himself and to the respect for his life and dignity.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵秉志;孟军;;我国刑事诉讼中的隐私权保护——以刑事被追诉人为视角[J];法治研究;2017年02期
2 白冰;;论被告人阅卷权的理论基础[J];时代法学;2016年04期
3 孔令勇;;论辩护律师与被告人审前全面核实证据的正当性[J];浙江工商大学学报;2016年04期
4 马传贝;;论以审判为中心诉讼制度下的控辩审关系[J];法制与社会;2016年16期
5 龙建明;;刑事被追诉人人身权与财产权差别保护研究[J];江汉学术;2016年02期
6 谢小剑;揭丽萍;;论辩护律师核实证据的限度[J];证据科学;2015年05期
7 郜占川;;论刑事被告人“阅卷权”及其实现途径[J];兰州学刊;2015年06期
8 张云玲;;刑事被告人的阅卷权探析[J];理论与改革;2015年03期
9 亢晶晶;;协同主义诉讼模式在刑事诉讼中的导入——兼谈我国控辩审关系的反思与重构[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2015年03期
10 王弘宁;刘佩;;中美刑事被追诉人权利保护差异性研究[J];刑法论丛;2014年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 谭羽;被追诉人会见权研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
2 姚雨;刑事被追诉方调查取证权研究[D];华中师范大学;2015年
,本文编号:1949862
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1949862.html