我国网络司法拍卖法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-30 14:16

本文选题：网络 + 拍卖　；参考：《兰州大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：司法拍卖作为民事执行程序中一种重要执行措施,是指司法机关依照法律规定,将被查封、扣押、冻结的财产强制予以拍卖的行为。司法拍卖的主要目的在于使债务得以清偿,债权得以实现,是保障当事人合法权益的重要环节。随着经济不断发展人们的法律意识也不断增强,传统委托拍卖在实施过程中的弊端日渐呈现。司法实践过程中,由于制度设计不完善,人为因素等干扰,导致在拍卖过程中频繁出现串标、围标、流拍、重拍等现象,严重损害当事人合法权益,司法权威被践踏。为了解决司法拍卖中出现的这些问题,部分地方法院将网络引入司法拍卖程序中,分别出现了浙江淘宝模式、重庆产权交易中心模式、最高人民法院组建的诉讼资产网模式。这标志着我国司法拍卖步入了新时代。本文主要分为四部分;第一部分对司法拍卖和网络司法拍卖作出法理分析,司法拍卖是网络司法拍卖的基础,有必要对司法拍卖作出法理分析,有助于对网络司法拍卖进一步研究。在第二节主要阐述了网络司法拍卖的产生背景,接下来针对网络司法拍卖在实践与理论发展过程中所出现的一些争议展开叙述,最后从客观角度出发对网络司法拍卖的优势做出概括介绍。第二部分主要是阐述了我国网络司法拍卖现存的三种模式,在对我国三种网络司法拍卖拍卖形式详细介绍的基础上做出了进一步的评析,以便于对我国现行网络司法拍卖有全面的了解。第三部分主要从立法的角度反映当前网络司法拍卖制度存在的一些法律问题,由于立法缺失导致网络司法拍卖实施过程中出现的层层阻碍。第四,针对立法上的缺陷提出一系列立法建议,完善我国网络司法拍卖制度。
[Abstract]:Judicial auction, as an important execution measure in civil execution procedure, refers to the act of compulsory auction of property which is sealed, seized and frozen by the judicial organ in accordance with the provisions of the law. The main purpose of judicial auction is to make the debt be paid off and the creditor's right be realized, which is an important link to protect the parties' legal rights and interests. With the development of economy, people's legal consciousness has been strengthened, and the malpractice of traditional entrustment auction appears day by day. In the process of judicial practice, due to imperfect system design and interference of human factors, there are frequently such phenomena as string marking, surround mark, stream beat and reshoot in the process of auction, which seriously damage the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned, and the judicial authority is trampled on. In order to solve these problems in the judicial auction, some local courts have introduced the network into the judicial auction procedure, respectively appeared Zhejiang Taobao model, Chongqing property rights transaction center model, the Supreme people's Court of litigation assets network model. This marks a new era of judicial auction in China. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part makes a legal analysis of judicial auction and network judicial auction, judicial auction is the basis of network judicial auction, it is necessary to make a legal analysis of judicial auction. It is helpful to further study the network judicial auction. In the second section, it mainly expounds the background of the network judicial auction, and then describes some disputes in the course of the practice and theory development of the network judicial auction. Finally, from the objective point of view, the advantages of network judicial auction are summarized. The second part mainly expounds the three existing models of the network judicial auction in our country, and makes further comments on the basis of the detailed introduction of the three forms of the network judicial auction in our country. In order to facilitate the current network of judicial auction in China has a comprehensive understanding. The third part mainly reflects some legal problems existing in the current network judicial auction system from the angle of legislation. Because of the lack of legislation, there are many obstacles in the implementation process of the network judicial auction. Fourth, a series of legislative suggestions are put forward to perfect our network judicial auction system.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.1;D926

【相似文献】