论生态环境民事公益诉讼的受案范围

发布时间：2018-05-30 11:54

本文选题：生态环境 + 环境权　；参考：《福州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：从2005年的松花江苯污染事件到最近兰州市饮用水苯污染事件,皆因原油泄漏致使水体污染,导致生态环境遭受损害,公众饮用水源不安全,身体健康受到威胁。今年全国许多城市连续多日处于雾霾之中,生态环境公益受到损害引起广泛关注。对生态环境公益法律保护、预防和救济方式等的研究,对传统的诉讼理论的反思,司法实践回应人民群众改善生态环境的需求,皆显得迫在眉睫。生态环境民事公益诉讼能得以健康运行,其首要解决的问题是人民法院确定此类案件的受案范围。因为受案范围是法律对生态公益的保护范围和程度的规范。受案范围既是人民法院对哪些生态环境民事公益案件司法主管权的具体化,也是人民法院可以对哪些损害生态环境民事公益行为行使审判权的范围。所以,研究生态环境民事公益诉讼受案范围的意义在于具体界定可操作性的受理标准,从而使生态公共利益得到保障和环境权得以实现。本课题的研究是在清晰诠释生态环境民事公益诉讼受案范围的相关概念的基础上,运用综合分析法、实证分析法和对比分析法而展开的。本文除引言和结语外,其主体部分主要内容如下：第一部分：厘清生态环境民事公益诉讼所涉及的概念,包括生态环境损害、环境权、生态、生态公益、生态环境民事公益诉讼和受案范围。第二部分：通过考察我国现行的法律依据,对比各地方人民法院和检察院出台的规范性文件不同的受案范围标准并分析规定不同受案范围的原因。第三部分：从界定方式、界定影响因素和界定内容三个方面为研究视角,提出生态环境民事公益诉讼具体受案范围。对因国家安全和公共安全而做出的国家及政府行为,以及为保护生态而采取的合理措施,不应列入生态环境民事公益诉讼的受案范围。本文的创新之处在于,国内外专家学者极少涉及生态环境民事公益诉讼具体受案范围的研究,而本研究以我国现行法律中仅有《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第五十五条原则性规定作为基点,从服务我国的司法实践为出发点,全面界定生态环境民事公益诉讼便于操作的具体受案范围。本研究是在此领域中首先尝试将各地方人民法院和检察院出台的具有代表性的规范性文件集中进行对比分析的基础上,提出具有独到见解的受案范围。
[Abstract]:From the benzene pollution incident of Songhua River in 2005 to the recent benzene pollution incident in drinking water of Lanzhou City, the pollution of water body caused by crude oil leakage caused damage to the ecological environment, the public drinking water source was unsafe, and the health of the public was threatened. Many cities in China are in haze for many days this year. It is urgent to study the legal protection, prevention and relief of the ecological environment, reflect on the traditional litigation theory, and respond to the needs of the people to improve the ecological environment in judicial practice. Ecological environment civil public interest litigation can run healthily. The most important problem to be solved is that the people's court determines the scope of such cases. Because the scope of the case is the legal scope and degree of protection of ecological public welfare norms. The scope of accepting a case is not only the embodiment of the people's court's jurisdiction over which ecological environment civil public welfare cases are in charge of, but also the scope in which the people's court can exercise its jurisdiction over which civil public welfare acts that damage the ecological environment. Therefore, the significance of studying the scope of ecological environment civil public interest litigation is to define the operational acceptance standard, so that the ecological public interest can be protected and the environmental right can be realized. The research of this subject is based on the clear interpretation of the relevant concepts of the scope of the ecological environment civil public interest litigation cases, the use of comprehensive analysis, empirical analysis and comparative analysis. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the main contents of this paper are as follows: the first part: clarify the concept of ecological environment civil public interest litigation, including ecological environmental damage, environmental rights, ecological public welfare, Scope of civil public interest litigation and acceptance of ecological environment. The second part: by investigating the current legal basis of our country, the author compares the different standards of accepting cases issued by various local people's courts and procuratorates, and analyzes the reasons for prescribing the scope of different cases. The third part: from the definition way, defines the influence factor and the definition content three aspects as the research angle, proposes the ecological environment civil public interest lawsuit concrete acceptance scope. The actions of the state and government for national security and public safety, as well as the reasonable measures taken to protect ecology, should not be included in the scope of civil public interest litigation for ecological environment. The innovation of this paper lies in the fact that experts and scholars at home and abroad rarely involved in the study of the scope of specific cases of ecological environment civil public interest litigation. This study, based on the principle of Article 55 of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, and from the judicial practice of serving our country, is the starting point of this study. Fully define the ecological environment civil public interest litigation to facilitate the operation of the specific scope of cases. This study is based on the comparative analysis of the representative normative documents issued by local people's courts and procuratorates in this field, and puts forward the scope of accepting cases with unique opinions.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】