司法能动与中国司法改革的走向

发布时间：2018-05-31 01:17

本文选题：司法功能 + 司法能动　；参考：《法学评论》2013年02期

【摘要】：司法能动是司法功能的一种积极作为的表现形式,但如何把握司法的功能始终是一个有争议的问题。在西方,司法能动以司法独立为前提、经违宪审查裁定,是一个逻辑自洽的自控体系;同时,以民主选举为基础、受分权政府控制,也是一个民意传导的他控体系;可以说,没有司法独立,司法能动不过是"跛脚能动"或者"胎儿躁动",没有权力制约,司法能动可能会导致司法盲动甚至司法独裁。在中国,自2008年以来,司法能动成为司法改革的一种主导力量。但是,当下中国推行司法能动存在着体制障碍和价值畸重等方面的问题,因此,中国的司法能动应当注意:司法改革与政治改革、个案正义与社会正义、法律优位与政策适用以及民主司法与精英司法等方面的协调问题。
[Abstract]:Judicial initiative is an active form of judicial function, but how to grasp the function of judicature is always a controversial issue. In the West, judicial initiative is based on the premise of judicial independence and has been ruled through unconstitutional review as a logical and self-consistent system of self-control; at the same time, on the basis of democratic elections and under the control of a decentralized government, it is also a system of independent control of public opinion; it can be said that: Without judicial independence, judicial action is merely "lame motion" or "fetal restlessness". Without power restriction, judicial action may lead to judicial blindness or even judicial dictatorship. In China, since 2008, judicial initiative has become a leading force in judicial reform. However, there are some problems in carrying out judicial initiative in China at present, such as system obstacles and abnormal value. Therefore, China's judicial initiative should pay attention to: judicial reform and political reform, case justice and social justice, etc. The coordination between the superiority of law and the application of policy, and between democratic justice and elite justice.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：作者主持的国家社科基金项目《中国特色协商民主的宪制研究》(项目编号:09BFX014)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】