侦查讯问制度的法经济学分析
发布时间:2018-05-31 03:01
本文选题:侦查讯问 + 制度规则 ; 参考:《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:侦查讯问在刑事诉讼程序中具有重要的地位,近年来,许多“冤假错案”的发生引人注目,“佘祥林案”、“杜培武案”、“赵作海案”历历在目,还有前段时间热议的“呼格吉勒图案”一桩桩、一件件。案件中,无辜者坐了多年冤狱,真正的犯罪嫌疑人却逍遥法外。不仅如此,无辜者都曾在原案刑事诉讼阶段无一例外的做过有罪供述,原案件侦查阶段警察甚至实施过刑讯逼供,犯罪嫌疑人的基本人权更是得不到保证。这一系列冤假错案的发生,深究其根本原因就在于我国侦查讯问环节出现了一些问题。在案件侦查过程中,侦查人员为了获取犯罪嫌疑人的口供,往往片面顾忌时效而忽视侦查讯问制度的规定,这侵害的不仅仅是无辜者的利益,触动的是我国侦查讯问制度,更大大的增加了我国刑事侦查的成本,甚至是整个刑事诉讼的成本,最终引起社会对中国法治的极度不信任。本文的研究范围并非局限于侦查讯问的单个环节中,而是以侦查讯问为出发点,着眼于刑事诉讼的全过程。从对刑事诉讼全过程进行法经济学分析,分析侦查讯问给刑事诉讼过程带来的成本与收益,最终对讯问制度如何立法进行法经济学的分析。对该论文的研究主要从当前我国侦查讯问制度的现状入手,研究当前我国立法甚至是司法实践中对于侦查讯问制度的不足。并且运用一个新的法经济学的视角来分析侦查讯问制度立法中需要对哪些制度进行调整。最终运用法经济学的理论帮助我们完善侦查讯问制度。本文的创新点一方面在于从法经济学分析的角度来分析侦查讯问制度,并且谈及侦查讯问规则的构建,另一方面,就在于着眼于整个刑事诉讼的全过程对成本收益进行分析。从法经济学视角入手而研究侦查讯问规则的学者并不甚多。大部分研究侦查讯问规则都是从刑事诉讼法及证据法的视角入手的,并未考虑到侦查这个至关重要的刑事诉讼流程还需要从法理学、法哲学的角度入手来分析。法经济学作为一个法学二级学科为侦查讯问规则的构建提供了科学的分析方法和指导。从这个角度来分析问题,就更可以科学的追根溯源,找寻立法的方向和目标,找到司法实务的指引。从而更加科学立法,更加高效的执法。
[Abstract]:Investigation and interrogation have an important position in the criminal procedure. In recent years, many "false and misjudged cases" have attracted much attention. "She Xianglin case", "Du Peiwu case", "Zhao Zuohai case", and the hot discussion of "hog Gille pattern" in the previous period, one piece. In the case, the innocent person has been in prison for many years. The criminal suspects are at large. Not only that, the innocent have ever made a guilty confession in the criminal procedure of the original case, but the police even carried out a confession by torture in the investigation stage of the original case, and the basic human rights of the suspects are not guaranteed. The root cause of this series of wrongful and wrong cases lies in me. In the process of investigation and interrogation in China, there are some problems. In the process of investigation, in order to obtain the confession of the suspects, the investigators often ignore the provisions of the investigation and interrogation system, which is not only the interests of the innocent, but also touches the investigation and interrogation system of our country, and has greatly increased the criminal investigation of our country. The cost, even the cost of the whole criminal procedure, eventually leads to the extreme distrust of the society for the rule of law in China. The scope of this study is not confined to the single link of investigation and interrogation, but on the basis of investigation and interrogation, focusing on the whole process of criminal proceedings. From the analysis of the law and economics of the whole process of criminal proceedings, the analysis of investigation and investigation The cost and benefit of interrogation to the process of criminal procedure, and the analysis of the law and economics of how the interrogation system is legislating. The study of the paper is mainly based on the current situation of the current investigation and interrogation system in China, and studies the shortcomings of the current legislation and even the judicial practice in the judicial practice. And the application of a new law is also used. From the perspective of economics to analyze which system should be adjusted in the legislation of investigation and interrogation system. The theory of economics of transportation in the end helps us improve our investigation and interrogation system. The innovation point of this paper is to analyze the investigation and interrogation system from the perspective of the analysis of law and economics, and discuss the construction of the rules of investigation and interrogation, the other It is to analyze the cost and benefit of the whole process of criminal proceedings. There are not many scholars studying the rules of interrogation from the perspective of law and economics. Most of the investigation and interrogation rules are from the perspective of the criminal procedure law and the evidence law, and do not take into account the critical criminal procedure of investigation. The process needs to be analyzed from the perspective of jurisprudence and legal philosophy. Law and economics, as a two discipline of law, provides a scientific analysis method and guidance for the construction of investigation and interrogation rules. From this point of view, it is more scientific to trace the source, find the direction and goal of the law, and find the guidance of judicial practice. So more scientific legislation, more efficient law enforcement.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曹加仁;韩少冲;;刑讯逼供的成本——收益构成浅析[J];法制与社会;2014年10期
2 赵宏军;;论职务犯罪侦查中的同步录音录像[J];法制与社会;2013年04期
3 陈光中;汪海燕;;侦查阶段律师辩护问题研究——兼论修订后的《律师法》实施问题[J];中国法学;2010年01期
4 李冬梅;韦经建;;论现代环境法面临的若干新问题——以美国环境法为视角[J];当代法学;2008年03期
5 汪慧丹;;从米兰达规则中反思沉默权[J];法制与社会;2007年12期
6 贺振华;;美国米兰达规则发展探析[J];河南社会科学;2006年05期
7 刘红梅;王克强;郑策;;公众参与环境保护研究综述[J];甘肃社会科学;2006年04期
8 谢川豫;刑讯逼供的经济学解析——以刑事侦查为视角[J];法学论坛;2005年05期
9 钱弘道;经济分析法学的几个基本概念阐释[J];同济大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
10 杨蓉;简论法律经济分析的三个原则[J];检察实践;2004年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 乔会娟;中国刑事违法讯问的成本研究[D];华侨大学;2012年
2 张妍妍;侦查讯问制度研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
,本文编号:1958027
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1958027.html