追诉期限终点再认识——基于法解释学的梳理

发布时间：2018-06-01 16:58

本文选题：追诉期限终点 + 强制时说　；参考：《法商研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：追诉期限的终点如何确定是我国刑法学界和司法实务界争议较大的一个问题。"强制时说"与刑法文义解释的基本要求不符,因而早已被摒弃;"立案时说"虽然见诸最高人民检察院的规范性文件,并且系我国刑法学界的主流学说,但是其因系对追诉期限所做的不利于被告的限制解释以及对司法解释的适用范围所做的不利于被告的扩大解释而有违刑法解释的基本规则,因而难以经受合理性诘问;"审判时说"虽然接近对追诉期限文义的正解,但是以"审判时"这一模糊术语作为追诉期限的终点不具有特定性和唯一性,易引发新的纷争,并且,其将1997年《刑法》第88条规定的反对解释引作支撑其文义解释的理据,是基于对该条规定的严重误读,因而反使其系统解释与文义解释不相吻合,难以令人信服;"结果时说"完全符合追诉期限之本义,契合文义解释的基本要求,并且可以从2012年《刑事诉讼法》第15条第2款的规定得到系统解释的有力支撑,尤其是相对而言,其是一种最有利于被告的解释,因此,其应当成为我国刑法学界和司法实务界共同遵循的通说。
[Abstract]:How to determine the end point of the prosecution period is one of the most controversial issues in the criminal and judicial circles of our country. "The doctrine of coercion" is discarded with the basic requirements of the interpretation of the criminal law, and has long been abandoned; "on the case of filing a case", although it is seen in the normative text of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and is the mainstream theory of the criminal law of our country, but it is the main doctrine of the criminal law of our country. It is difficult to cross examine the basic rules of the criminal interpretation because it is not conducive to the explanation of the defendant and the extended interpretation of the scope of the application of the judicial interpretation, which is contrary to the basic rules of the interpretation of the criminal law. As the end of the period of prosecution, the end of the period of prosecution is not specific and unique, and it easily leads to new disputes, and it is based on the serious misinterpretation of the provisions of the eighty-eighth provisions of the 1997 criminal law, which is based on the serious misinterpretation of the provisions of the article, so that it does not conform to the interpretation of the system and the interpretation of the text, and is difficult to convince. " The meaning of "fully complying with the duration of the prosecution" is in accordance with the basic requirements of the interpretation of the text, and it can be strongly supported by the provisions of the fifteenth article of the criminal procedure law of 2012, and in particular, it is one of the most beneficial explanations for the defendant. Therefore, it should be the joint of the criminal and judicial circles of our country. Follow the general statement.
【作者单位】：湖南师范大学法学院;
【基金】：湖南省重点学科湖南师范大学法学一级学科资助项目
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】