刑事和解在审查逮捕阶段的适用

发布时间：2018-06-02 07:40

本文选题：刑事和解 + 审查逮捕　；参考：《人民检察》2013年15期

【摘要】：正刑事和解作为一个制度性概念,最早出现在20世纪的北美和欧洲。1974年,加拿大安大略省施行了一种叫作被害人与加害人的和解计划,即在专门调解人的主持下,由被害人和加害人面对面地接触,就犯罪事实和后果进行沟通交流,并积极实现赔偿,恢复双方关系。此后,西欧各国、北美、拉美、大洋洲等地区的一些国家推行了一系列刑事和解制度,以践行"恢复性司法理念"。为贯彻宽严相济的刑事司法政策,我国对刑事和解制度展开了积极的实践与探索,并最终将成果写进了修改后刑诉法中。刑事和解制度的适用一般包括侦查阶段的适用、审查起诉阶段的适用和审判阶段的适用。在检察机关的审查逮捕阶段引入刑事和解机制,对节约司法成本,提高诉讼效率有着更为重要的意义。审查逮捕阶段的刑事和解是检察机关侦查监督部门在介入公安机关侦查活动以后至作出是否逮捕的决定以前,犯罪嫌疑人和被害人达成和解协议的,司法机关不再追究其刑事责任、不予羁押或建议对其从轻处罚的一种案件处理方法。
[Abstract]:Criminal reconciliation, as an institutional concept, first emerged in North America and Europe in the 20th century. In 1974, Ontario, Canada, implemented a settlement program called victims and perpetrators, under the auspices of specialized mediators. Victims and perpetrators face to face contact, on the facts and consequences of the crime to communicate and exchange, and actively achieve compensation, restore the relationship between the two sides. Since then, some countries in Western Europe, North America, Latin America, Oceania and other regions have implemented a series of criminal reconciliation systems to practice the concept of restorative justice. In order to carry out the criminal justice policy of combining leniency and severity, our country has carried out positive practice and exploration on the system of criminal reconciliation, and has finally written the results into the revised Criminal procedure Law. The application of the criminal reconciliation system generally includes the application of the investigation stage, the examination of the prosecution stage and the application of the trial stage. The introduction of criminal reconciliation mechanism in the stage of procuratorial examination and arrest has a more important meaning to save the judicial cost and improve the efficiency of litigation. The criminal reconciliation at the stage of examining and arresting is where the investigation and supervision department of the procuratorial organ has reached an agreement on reconciliation between the criminal suspect and the victim after intervening in the investigation activities of the public security organ and before making a decision on whether to arrest or not. A method of handling cases in which judicial authorities no longer pursue their criminal responsibility, do not detain them or recommend lenient penalties.
【作者单位】：北京市昌平区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】