民事诉讼当事人证据收集研究
发布时间:2018-06-03 02:44
本文选题:证据 + 证据收集 ; 参考:《广东财经大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文在现有的研究基础上,以当事人收集证据的程式为中心展开对民事诉讼当事人证据收集的剖析,试图以一种理想的样式呈现收集证据的应然面相。通过结合司法实践的案例,从证据收集的指涉客体——证据种类入手,分析收集证据的一般程式和特殊程式,并就如何保障运作提出完善的建议。 除前言和结语外,正文共由四部分组成,具体结构如下: 第一章:民事诉讼证据收集的畛域。本章运用诉讼方法论对民事诉讼证据种类进行探讨,在指出我国证据种类立法模式给证据收集带来实践困境的同时就如何完善提出改进的意见。 第二章:民事诉讼当事人证据收集的一般程式。以证据收集程式内在机理的梳理为基础,针对不同的取证对象,进行考察分析,并就如何完善向对方当事人、证人、第三人收集证据的程序提出建议。 第三章:民事诉讼当事人证据收集的特殊程式。以需要法院介入才能产生启动程序的效果为标准,将当事人向法院申请调查取证、申请证据保全、通过证据交换发现证据界定为民事诉讼当事人证据收集的特殊程式,并试图扩充其证据收集的功能。 第四章:民事诉讼当事人证据收集的保障。一方面探索保障当事人证据收集程序运作的措施,另一方面,关注取证对象合法权益的保障。首次提出在法院建立征信系统,,将不配合证据收集的个人或单位的信息进行采集和整理,作为其涉讼并向法院申请调查取证,法院裁量是否准予申请的因素。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the existing research, this paper takes the procedure of collecting evidence as the center to analyze the collection of evidence in civil litigation, and tries to present the face of collecting evidence in an ideal way. Based on the case of judicial practice, this paper analyzes the general and special procedures of evidence collection from the point of view of the object involved in evidence collection-the types of evidence, and puts forward some suggestions on how to ensure the operation of evidence collection. In addition to the preface and conclusion, the text is composed of four parts, the specific structure is as follows: Chapter one: the field of evidence collection in civil proceedings. This chapter probes into the types of evidence in civil litigation by means of litigation methodology, and points out that the legislative model of evidence types in our country has brought practical difficulties to the collection of evidence, and at the same time puts forward some suggestions on how to improve it. Chapter two: the general procedure of evidence collection in civil litigation. On the basis of combing the internal mechanism of evidence collection program, this paper investigates and analyzes different evidential objects, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the procedure of collecting evidence from the other party, witness and third party. Chapter three: the special procedure for collecting evidence in civil litigation. Based on the criterion that court intervention is required to produce the effect of initiating proceedings, the parties concerned are defined as a special procedure for collecting evidence in civil litigation by applying to the court for investigation and evidence preservation, and for the discovery of evidence through evidence exchange. And attempts to expand its evidence collection function. Chapter IV: the protection of the collection of evidence by the parties in civil proceedings. On the one hand, it explores the measures to ensure the operation of the party's evidence-gathering procedure, on the other hand, pays attention to the protection of the lawful rights and interests of the object. It is proposed for the first time to set up a credit system in the court to collect and organize the information of individuals or units that do not cooperate with the evidence collection as a factor of litigating and applying to the court to investigate and obtain evidence, and whether the court can grant the application or not.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.13
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 许少波;;民事诉讼证据交换制度的立法探讨[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年03期
2 罗纳德·J·艾伦;蒋雨佳;强卉;张姝丽;;证明责任[J];证据科学;2012年05期
3 李浩;民事证据法的目的[J];法学研究;2004年05期
4 龙宗智;证据分类制度及其改革[J];法学研究;2005年05期
5 许少波;;证据保全制度的功能及其扩大化[J];法学研究;2009年01期
6 朱新林;;论当事人证据收集权的程序保障[J];法学论坛;2012年05期
7 徐昕;;法官为什么不相信证人? 证人在转型中国司法过程中的作用[J];中外法学;2006年03期
8 熊跃敏;日本新民事诉讼法中的当事人照会制度介评[J];政治与法律;2002年02期
本文编号:1971158
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1971158.html