中国民事裁判说理:路径选择与实现方式

发布时间：2018-06-04 20:04

  本文选题：裁判功能 + 裁判说理　； 参考：《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：现实生活中,司法裁判承载着纠纷解决、社会行为规范、社会价值引导等多元功能。因此,裁判文书应当充分发挥其说理特性,将案件争议、事实、证据与法律规则之间的关联及其相互影响进行精确的分析和阐释。裁判说理的好坏,主要取决于说理能力、说理环境以及说理载体。现阶段,我国应当将完善说理载体作为加强裁判说理的首要路径。完善说理载体,不应盲目采取司法移植的路径,而应当在参考域外经验的基础上,对我国说理载体的"构件"进行拆分,并以现行民事诉讼立法和裁判说理的规律为指导,对拆分后的"要素"进行重组,继而准确定位重组后各"构件"的功能,创制出有利于说理的文书载体形式,提升我国裁判的说理性。
[Abstract]:In real life, judicial adjudication carries multiple functions such as dispute resolution, social behavior norms and social value guidance. Therefore, the adjudicative document should give full play to its reasoning characteristics, and accurately analyze and explain the relation and mutual influence between the dispute, the fact, the evidence and the rule of law. The good or bad judgment reasoning mainly depends on the reasoning ability, the reasoning environment and the reasoning carrier. At present, our country should take the perfect reasoning carrier as the primary path to strengthen the judgment reasoning. To perfect the theory carrier, we should not blindly adopt the path of judicial transplantation, but should split the "component" of our country's reasoning carrier on the basis of reference to the overseas experience, and take the current civil litigation legislation and the law of judgment reasoning as the guidance. This paper recombines the "elements" after splitting, and then accurately locates the function of each "component" after the reorganization, creates the form of the document carrier which is beneficial to the reasoning, and promotes the rationality of the judgment in our country.
【作者单位】： 湘潭大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.1
，

本文编号：1978663