刑事再审中的发回重审制度研究

发布时间：2018-06-04 20:30

本文选题：发回重审 + 立法现状　；参考：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：刑事再审中的发回重审是指在我国刑事再审程序中，依照第二审程序审理再审案件的人民法院经审理认为原审人民法院的已生效裁判存在法定情形时，作出的撤销原判，将案件发回原审人民法院重新审判的一种处理方式。众所周知，我国长期存在“重实体、轻程序”，“重秩序、轻自由”，“重打击、轻保护”的传统司法观念。作为特殊救济程序中的发回重审制度的设置和运行，依然逃脱不了上述传统司法观念的束缚，而且在一定程度上，该制度的设置是上述传统司法观念的贯彻和落实。刑事再审中的发回重审制度，，不仅缺乏现代的司法理念作理论支撑，而且在立法和司法实践中都存在诸多的问题，更甚的是在司法实践中造成了很多不利的影响。对刑事再审中的发回重审制度进行研究目的在于，在现代先进的法治理念指导下对刑事再审中的发回重审制进行深入分析，提出废除再审中发回重审做法的合理建议。本文采用理论和实践相结合的方法，从刑事再审中的发回重审制度的概念、法律特征和理论依据出发，对该制度的立法现状进行了比较细致地分析，并对该制度的司法实践进行了考察和分析，接着进行了比较深入地理性反思，最后建议废除我国现行的刑事再审中的发回重审制度。本文由引言、正文和小结三大部分组成。其中正文又分为四个小部分。第一部分概述了刑事再审中的发回重审制度的概念、法律特征及设置该制度的理论依据。第二部分对我国刑事再审中的发回重审制度从立法和司法实践进行了全面考察和深入分析。第三部分对我国刑事再审中的发回重审制度进行了理性地反思。第四部分建议废除我国刑事再审中的发回重审制度，并从废除该制度的必要性和可行性两方面进行了分析，最后还提出废除发回重审制度后的处理。其一，废除刑事再审中的发回重审制度是保障被告人的公正审判权、提高刑事再审诉讼效率、实现再审人民法院对原审人民法院有效监督的需要。其二，废除刑事再审中的发回重审制度也具有可行性。因为刑事再审案件数量有限，而且现行的以再审理由为重点的全面审查方式也能够保障再审裁判的质量。其三，刑事再审案件应当坚持开庭审理的审理方式，坚持以再审理由为重点的全面审查原则，保障案件当事人获得律师帮助的权利。
[Abstract]:Retrial in criminal retrial refers to the revocation of the original judgment made by a people's court hearing a retrial case in accordance with the second instance procedure in our country when the people's court considers that there is a statutory situation in the effective judgment of the people's court of the original instance, A method of handling a case back to a people's court for a new trial. As we all know, our country has long existed the traditional judicial concept of "attaching importance to substance, neglecting procedure", "emphasizing order, neglecting freedom", "attaching importance to strike, not protecting". As the setup and operation of the retrial system in the special relief procedure, it still can not escape the bondage of the above-mentioned traditional judicial concepts, and to some extent, the establishment of the system is the implementation and implementation of the above-mentioned traditional judicial concepts. The system of retrial in criminal retrial not only lacks the theoretical support of modern judicial idea, but also has many problems in legislation and judicial practice, and has caused many adverse effects in judicial practice. The purpose of the research on the system of retrial in criminal retrial is to analyze deeply the system of retrial in criminal retrial under the guidance of the modern advanced concept of rule of law, and to put forward some reasonable suggestions for abolishing the practice of retrial in retrial. Based on the concept, legal characteristics and theoretical basis of the system of retrial in criminal retrial, this paper, by combining theory and practice, makes a detailed analysis of the present legislative situation of the system. The judicial practice of this system has been investigated and analyzed, and then the rational reflection has been carried out, and finally it is proposed to abolish the current system of retrial in criminal retrial in our country. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and summary. The text is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the concept, legal characteristics and theoretical basis of the system of retrial in criminal retrial. The second part makes a comprehensive investigation and in-depth analysis on the system of retrial in criminal retrial from the legislative and judicial practice. The third part makes a rational reflection on the retrial system of criminal retrial in our country. The fourth part proposes to abolish the system of retrial in criminal retrial in China, and analyzes the necessity and feasibility of abolishing the system. Finally, it puts forward the treatment after abolishing the system of retrial. First, abolishing the system of retrial in the criminal retrial is to protect the defendant's right to a fair trial, to improve the efficiency of the criminal retrial, and to realize the need for the people's court of retrial to supervise the people's court of the original instance effectively. Second, abolishing the system of retrial in criminal retrial is also feasible. Because the number of criminal retrial cases is limited, and the current comprehensive review mode focusing on retrial reasons can also guarantee the quality of retrial adjudication. Third, the criminal retrial case should adhere to the trial mode of the court session, adhere to the principle of comprehensive review focused on the reason of retrial, and guarantee the right of the parties to the case to obtain the help of the lawyer.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】