民事诉讼送达难及其对策研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 07:04

本文选题：民事送达 + 送达难　；参考：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事送达是指人民法院依照法律规定的程序和方式,将诉讼活动中有关的诉讼文书送交给案件的当事人或者是与其他诉讼参与人的一种行为。送达是民事诉讼活动中最基本和必不可少的环节,其重要性不证自明。依据法律规定,相关的诉讼文书一旦被送达,就产生了无论是实体方面还是程序方面的效力。但是长久以来,由于受到多种原因的影响,“送达难”问题异常凸出。特别是一些基层法院,“送达难”问题和“执行难”问题并称为民事诉讼活动中的两大顽疾,难以根治。在当前的社会大背景下,随着我国经济和社会的进步与发展,人民矛盾的不断加剧,民事案件审判数量显现出激增的态势,案情也较为复杂,而出现在送达过程中的矛盾和问题也越来越突出。这些矛盾和问题,除了送达制度自身的上层设置以外,更多的是在审判实践中出现的各种送达不能和送达不利,这些矛盾和问题制约和阻碍了其他民事审判活动的顺利开展。合法、规范的送达是实现法律公正、提高审判效率的必要前提,是当事人感受审判过程公平和正义的一面镜子。但是从目前来讲,无论是从立法界还是实务界,均对“送达难”问题缺乏足够的认识,难以提出切实可行的解决思路和方案。论文运用实证分析的方法,从审判实践中遇到的各种“送达难”的问题着手,从理论到实践进行梳理,明确“送达难”问题的现状和表现,分析“送达难”问题的成因,通过对送达过程当中存在的送达不能和送达不力问题进行阐述和分析,重点分析审判实践当中广泛用到的如直接送达、邮寄送达、留置送达、公告送达等送达方式,分析其各自的特点,了解几种常用送达方式送达难的现状,从各自面临的不同困难,多视角的进行反思,提出有针对性的对策研究和解决方案,从而完善现行的送达制度,解决由此问题引发的一系列“送达难”难题,以此实现民事诉讼程序中“公正”和“效率”的有机统一,保障民事诉讼活动能够依法、高效、有序地顺利进行。
[Abstract]:Civil service refers to a kind of act that the people's court sends the relevant litigation documents to the parties of the case or with other litigant participants according to the procedure and manner stipulated by law. Service is the most basic and essential link in civil action, and its importance is unproved. According to the law, relevant litigation documents, once served, have both substantive and procedural effects. However, for a long time, due to the influence of many reasons, the problem of "difficult to deliver" has become very prominent. Especially in some basic courts, the problems of "hard to serve" and "difficult to execute" are called as the two major persistent diseases in civil litigation activities, which are difficult to cure. Under the background of the current society, with the progress and development of our economy and society, the people's contradictions continue to intensify, the number of civil cases is showing a sharp increase, and the case is more complicated. The contradictions and problems in the process of service are becoming more and more prominent. These contradictions and problems, in addition to the upper layer of the service system itself, more than in the trial practice of all kinds of service and service unfavorable, these contradictions and problems restrict and hinder the smooth development of other civil trial activities. The legal and standard service is the necessary premise to realize the justice of law and improve the efficiency of trial. It is also a mirror for the parties to feel the fairness and justice of the trial process. But at present, no matter from the legislative or practical circles, there is a lack of sufficient understanding of the problem of "hard to serve", and it is difficult to put forward practical ideas and solutions. By using the method of empirical analysis, this paper begins with the problems of "difficult to serve" in trial practice, combs from theory to practice, clarifies the present situation and performance of the problem of "difficult to serve", and analyzes the causes of the problem of "difficult to serve". Through the elaboration and analysis of the problems existing in the service process, such as direct service, mail service, lien service, notice service and so on, the emphasis is on analyzing the service methods widely used in trial practice, such as direct service, mail service, retention service, notice service, etc. This paper analyzes their respective characteristics, understands the present situation of several common service modes, reflects on the different difficulties they face, and puts forward some countermeasures and solutions to perfect the current service system. In order to realize the organic unification of "justice" and "efficiency" in the civil procedure, we can solve a series of difficult problems of service caused by this problem, and ensure that the civil litigation activities can proceed smoothly according to law, efficiently and orderly.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】