智慧法院的法理审思

发布时间：2018-06-05 11:01

本文选题：智慧法院 + 工具理性　；参考：《法学》2017年03期

【摘要】：智慧法院是以实现司法公正和高效为目标,以数据开放共享和安全可信为基础,运用大数据和云计算等信息技术,促进司法审执公正化和法院管理高效化的信息化系统。当前智慧法院建设在实践中存在地方性试点意义有限、数据化基础还不坚实、司法数据仍是闭环流通等问题,导致智能化程度不足,智能应用目标难以实现。工具理性对司法意义的消解,智慧管理对司法自主的削弱,智慧应用对司法平等的分化以及服务外包对司法公信的威胁,是智慧法院存在的法理困境。坚持以人为本、技术中性的理念,坚持对司法公平正义的追求,应是对待智慧法院的理性态度。
[Abstract]:The intelligent court is an information system which aims at realizing judicial justice and high efficiency, based on open data sharing, security and credibility, and uses information technology such as big data and cloud computing to promote justice of judicial adjudication and high efficiency of court management. At present, there are some problems in the construction of intelligent court, such as the limited significance of local pilot projects, the unsound basis of digitization, the closed loop circulation of judicial data, and so on, which leads to the lack of intelligence and the difficulty of realizing the goal of intelligent application. The elimination of instrumental rationality to judicial meaning, the weakening of wisdom management to judicial autonomy, the differentiation of wisdom application to judicial equality and the threat of service outsourcing to judicial public trust are the legal dilemma of wisdom courts. Adhering to the idea of people-oriented and technical neutrality, and insisting on the pursuit of judicial fairness and justice, should be the rational attitude towards the wisdom court.
【作者单位】：南京信息工程大学法律系;
【基金】：江苏省社科基金项目“新媒体环境下刑事司法的舆论应对机制研究”(14FXC004) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目“基层法院的功能厘定与管理创新研究”(2013SJB820015)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】