刑事证人出庭作证实施问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 12:38

本文选题：证人出庭作证 + 证据能力　；参考：《西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)》2017年10期

【摘要】：在新刑事诉讼法实施后,通过实务考察,发现证人出庭作证情况变化不大,司法机关不愿意证人出庭作证,出庭证人的口头证言并不一定被采纳,法官对证人出庭作证必要性的裁决说理不够。主要原因是新刑诉法没有否定关键证人书面证言的证据能力,传统印证证明模式的深远影响,非法获取的证人证言转化为非法实物证据而更加难以排除,法官对证人出庭作证的必要性不合理裁量不受追究,以及司法人员自身能力不足等。因此,为了使证人出庭作证,应当明确关键证人的范围,把未到庭的证人限定为非关键证人;加强司法人员能力建设,让其习惯于证人出庭作证情形;完善相关配套措施,促使证人出庭作证。
[Abstract]:After the implementation of the new Code of Criminal procedure, through practical investigation, it was found that the situation of witnesses appearing in court did not change much, that the judicial organs did not want witnesses to testify in court, and that the oral testimony of witnesses in court was not necessarily accepted. The judge's ruling on the necessity of a witness to testify in court was not justified enough. The main reason is that the new Criminal procedure Law does not negate the evidence ability of the key witness's written testimony, the profound influence of the traditional proof mode, the illegally obtained witness's testimony is transformed into the illegal physical evidence, and it is more difficult to rule out. The judge's unreasonable discretion on the necessity of the witness to testify in court is not investigated, and the judicial personnel's own ability is insufficient. Therefore, in order to enable witnesses to testify in court, we should define the scope of key witnesses, limit the witnesses who are not present in court as non-key witnesses, strengthen the capacity-building of judicial personnel, make them accustomed to witness appearing in court to testify, and improve the relevant supporting measures. To induce a witness to testify in court.
【作者单位】：阜阳师范学院政法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“刑事诉讼特别程序实施问题研究”(12XFX015)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】