网络犯罪证明简化论

发布时间：2018-06-06 11:19

本文选题：网络犯罪 + 证明　；参考：《中国刑事法杂志》2017年06期

【摘要】：惩治网络犯罪的重点在于有效化解证明难题。网络犯罪证明难题既缘于技术障碍,也缘于法律缺位;既有国际共性原因,也有中国个性原因。合理对策是分类化解网络犯罪证明的法律障碍。对此,我国可以借鉴国际经验构建网络犯罪的简易证明机制,即通过法律扩张解释、证明责任移转与证明标准降格来消减网络犯罪的证明负担;通过推定、司法认知等非证据证明方法来直接确认相关事实。这属于普适性的体系化应对。同时,针对网络"二元制"治理架构带来的"数量情节"难认定的特殊问题,我国应当谨慎使用有实质缺陷的抽样取证与等约计量等方法,积极推行两步式的"底线证明法"。这属于中国式的简化方案。相比前者,更为重要,也易见成效。
[Abstract]:The emphasis of punishing network crime lies in resolving the problem of proof effectively. The problem of proving cyber crime is due to both technical obstacle and lack of law; there are both international common reasons and Chinese individual reasons. The reasonable countermeasure is the legal obstacle to dissolve the proof of network crime by classification. In view of this, our country can draw lessons from the international experience to construct the simple proof mechanism of the network crime, that is, to reduce the burden of proof of the network crime through the legal expansion explanation, the transfer of the burden of proof and the demotion of the standard of proof; Judicial notice and other non-evidentiary proof methods to directly confirm the relevant facts. This belongs to the system response of universality. At the same time, in view of the special problem of "quantity plot" difficult to determine brought by the governance structure of network "dualistic system", our country should use the sampling evidence and equal contract measurement methods with substantial defects, and actively carry out the two-step "bottom line proof method". This is a Chinese-style simplification scheme. Compared with the former, more important, but also easy to see results.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心;
【基金】：2016年国家社科基金年度项目“大数据时代电子文件的证据规则与管理法制建设研究”(项目批准号16BFX033) 2015年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“网络安全的刑事法治应对”(项目批准号15JJD820011)
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】