论民事诉讼证据开示制度

发布时间：2018-06-06 12:57

本文选题：证据开示 + 证据交换　；参考：《青岛大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,我国民事审判方式不断改革深入,同时司法实践对提高诉讼效率,维护诉讼公平有着越来越迫切的需要,在这种背景下我国通过司法解释,在民事诉讼中施行了证据交换制度。与英美证据开示制度相比,中国的证据交换制度同样源于司法知识的积累,源于司法实践的主动完善性,所以二者不仅有着密切的联系而且有着显著的区别。不难看出,中国证据交换制度的设立是为了强化当事人举证的能力与责任、防止庭审突袭、强化庭审功能以及提高庭审效率。而这些我们都能从英美的证据开示制度找到根源。我们同样试图利用其促进和解的功能去解决纷争,去减轻法院日渐繁重的审理工作。我国实施证据交换制度后,该制度是否适应我国的法治情况、诉讼体制?制度运行中存在哪些问题,如果想作出准确而有力的解答,需要对证据开示制度进行比较全面研究以及深入联系我国国情,以建立一个初步的制度构建框架。同时,证据交换制度在具体程序、细节、司法实践等方面尚处于初步阶段,如何构建一个完备、科学、有效的适合本国现实的证据开示是我们必须面对和亟待解决的问题。本文从证据开示制度的渊源、原理、价值基础以及证据开示制度弊端分析,试图找出我国证据交换制度中的缺点与不足,探讨如何完善和建立与我国法治环境相符的证据开示制度。并对该制度提出了初步设想与建议。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the way of civil trial in our country has been reformed deeply, at the same time, judicial practice has more and more urgent need to improve the efficiency of litigation and maintain the fairness of litigation. Under this background, our country adopts judicial interpretation. The system of exchange of evidence has been implemented in civil proceedings. Compared with the evidence discovery system in Britain and America, the evidence exchange system in China is also derived from the accumulation of judicial knowledge and the active perfection of judicial practice, so the two systems are not only closely related but also have significant differences. It is not difficult to see that the establishment of evidence exchange system in China is aimed at strengthening the party's ability and responsibility to prove evidence, preventing court raid, strengthening the function of trial and improving the efficiency of trial. All of these can be found from the evidence disclosure system in the United States and the United States. We also try to use its conciliatory function to resolve disputes and ease the increasing workload of the courts. After the implementation of the evidence exchange system in China, is the system suitable for the rule of law in our country, the litigation system? What problems exist in the operation of the system, if we want to make an accurate and effective answer, we need to make a more comprehensive study of the system of discovery of evidence, and to establish a preliminary framework of institutional construction by making a thorough contact with the national conditions of our country. At the same time, the system of evidence exchange is still in the initial stage in the aspects of concrete procedure, details, judicial practice, etc. How to construct a complete, scientific and effective evidence disclosure that suits the reality of our country is the problem that we must face and solve urgently. Based on the analysis of the origin, principle, value basis and malpractice of the evidence discovery system, this paper tries to find out the shortcomings and shortcomings of the evidence exchange system in our country. This paper probes into how to perfect and establish the system of discovery of evidence in accordance with the environment of rule of law in our country. And put forward the tentative idea and suggestion to this system.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.13

【参考文献】