审判中心主义视角下我国刑事证据制度立法完善研究

发布时间：2018-06-08 00:37

本文选题：审判中心主义 + 刑事证据制度　；参考：《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：证据乃刑事诉讼的灵魂,以证据为中心是“审判中心主义”的核心,因此在诉讼制度的改革过程中,对于刑事证据制度的研究至关重要。为此,本文以审判中心主义为视角,就我国刑事证据制度的立法完善提出自己的建议。首先,本文对“审判中心主义”这一概念进行理论上的阐述,对“审判中心主义”的概念进行界定,并阐述其必要性和现实要求;其次,本文对我国现行刑事证据制度进行立法检视,在梳理我国刑事证据制度的立法现状的基础上,总结现阶段存在的问题,分析问题产生的原因,并以实证研究的方法考查我国刑事证据制度立法上不足引发的司法裁判困境;再次,本文以比较研究的方法,以域外两大法系国家刑事证据制度为研究对象,通过对两大法系国家证据规则、证据认定模式、证明标准进行考察,结合我国刑事诉讼司法实践经验,探寻适合我国的刑事证据制度的立法完善进路。最后,本文从宏观层面的路径选择和微观层面的立法建议两个方面,提出我国刑事证据立法制度在“审判中心主义”改革背景具体完善建议,以期为我国刑事证据立法制度的进步贡献自己的力量。
[Abstract]:Evidence is the soul of criminal procedure, and taking evidence as the center is the core of "trial centralism", so it is very important to study the system of criminal evidence in the course of the reform of litigation system. Therefore, from the perspective of trial centralism, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the legislative perfection of China's criminal evidence system. Firstly, this paper expounds the concept of "trial centralism" in theory, defines the concept of "trial centralism", and expounds its necessity and practical requirements. This paper examines the current criminal evidence system in our country, on the basis of combing the current legislative situation of our criminal evidence system, summarizes the existing problems at the present stage and analyzes the causes of the problems. And the empirical research method to examine the lack of legislation on the criminal evidence system in China caused by the plight of judicial adjudication; thirdly, this paper takes the method of comparative study, taking the criminal evidence system of the two legal systems of foreign countries as the research object. Through the investigation of the evidence rules, the model of evidence confirmation and the standard of proof in the countries of two legal systems, and combining with the judicial practice experience of criminal procedure in our country, this paper explores the way to perfect the legislation of criminal evidence system suitable for our country. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legislative system of criminal evidence in the background of "trial centrism" from two aspects: the path choice at the macro level and the legislative suggestion at the micro level. In order to contribute to the progress of our criminal evidence legislation system.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】