诱惑侦查合法性判断的基本原则——基于法律经济学的审视

发布时间：2018-06-10 03:38

本文选题：诱惑侦查 + 犯意诱发　；参考：《山东警察学院学报》2017年03期

【摘要】：从司法操作层面上看,诱惑侦查主要涉及两个重点问题,即概念界定和操作原则。它们分别涉及诱惑侦查合法性与否的实质判断和形式判断。"犯意"和"机会"两分法未必周全,机会型诱惑侦查必然涉及犯意诱发问题,反之则未必。对诱惑侦查应作广义和狭义两种解释。在实务操作中,应当坚持"有中生有"和"同途同归"的操作原则。在某些特殊情形下,"无中生有"和"殊途同归"可以构成例外,但必须符合成本考量。为防范诱惑侦查的不当使用,实践中需要同步建立一套相对合理的检验程序,即自我答责和证据审查机制。
[Abstract]:From the aspect of judicial operation, the seduction investigation mainly involves two key issues, namely, the definition of concept and the principle of operation. They relate to the substantive judgment and formal judgment of the legality of enticement investigation, respectively. " The dichotomy of "criminal intention" and "opportunity" is not perfect. The temptation investigation should be interpreted in a broad sense and a narrow sense. In practical operation, we should adhere to the operating principles of "having students in the same path" and "returning together on the same path". In some exceptional cases, the two may constitute exceptions, but only in line with cost considerations. In order to prevent the improper use of enticement investigation, it is necessary to establish a relatively reasonable test procedure in practice, that is, self-answering responsibility and evidence examination mechanism.
【作者单位】：浙江警察学院侦查系;浙江大学法律与经济研究中心;
【基金】：2015年教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“国家治理现代化视野中的犯罪治理模式研究(1978-2013)”(项目编号:15YJS820085)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】