我国辩护律师讯问在场制度研究

发布时间：2018-06-10 15:34

本文选题：律师在场权 + 米兰达规则　；参考：《太原科技大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：审前程序有着高度封闭性，犯罪嫌疑人在缺乏律师帮助的情形下，由于部分侦查人员素质参差不齐以及侦查目的等多方因素之影响，容易出现非法讯问等非法侦讯现象。在场权通过“米兰达规则”的普及被世人所知，律师在场权的设置已成为现代刑事司法的“国际标准”，虽然我国《刑事诉讼法》对辩护权利进行了大范围的修改，遗憾的是并没有将律师在场这一重要的辩护权利纳入，本文所要讨论的即是侦查阶段讯问时的律师在场权范围。通过域外制度分析得出，律师在场制度设置的立足点并不在于抑制非法侦讯，其目的意义在于保障犯罪嫌疑人的供述自愿，不受公权机关的强力迫使。借此次我国刑诉法修改之际，关于在场权设置基础的辩护权利愈加完善，还有法援制度以及其他讯问措施的有力支持，笔者通过对我国侦查结构以及审前程序之特点分析，并借鉴国外相关优秀的制度设计，限定了在场权的渐进式发展的案件范围，明确在场律师的权利义务，确定了在不同案件中，在场权与沉默权和录音录像方式的协作方式，，逐步推进在场权的案件覆盖范围。
[Abstract]:Pretrial procedure is highly closed, criminal suspects in the absence of lawyers to help, due to the uneven quality of some investigators and investigation purposes and other factors, such as illegal interrogation and other illegal investigation. The right to present has been widely known by the world through the "Miranda rule", and the establishment of the right to be present by lawyers has become the "international standard" of modern criminal justice, although the Criminal procedure Law of our country has amended the right of defense in a wide range. Unfortunately, the important defense right of lawyer's presence is not included in this article, which is to discuss the scope of lawyer's right to be present in the investigation stage. Through the analysis of the extraterritorial system, it is concluded that the foothold of the lawyer's presence system is not to suppress the illegal investigation, but to ensure the criminal suspect's voluntary confession and not to be forced by the public authority. On the occasion of the revision of the Criminal procedure Law of our country, the defense right on the basis of setting up the right to present is becoming more and more perfect, as well as the strong support of the legal aid system and other interrogation measures. The author analyzes the characteristics of the investigation structure and the pretrial procedure of our country through the analysis of the legal aid system and other interrogation measures. And draw lessons from the foreign relevant excellent system design, limit the case scope of progressive development of the right to the scene, clarify the rights and obligations of the lawyers present, determine the right to be present and the right to silence in different cases, and the way of cooperation between the right to be present and the right to silence and the way of audio and video recording. The case coverage of the right to be present should be gradually advanced.
【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】