重复供述排除问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-12 14:18

本文选题：重复供述 + 违法行为　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：重复供述是指讯问人员在通过前次非法讯问的方式获得了嫌疑人的有罪供述后再通过合法的讯问来得到的嫌疑人的有罪供述。重复供述不仅仅是多次有罪供述在内容上的重复,前次非法手段对再次供述的取得产生的影响及两者的内在联系才是重复供述需要排除的实质所在,当再次供述是在嫌疑人还处于对前次非法取供行为的恐慌中的情形下取得时,尽管再次供述的内容可能已经超越甚至是改变了前次供述的内容,但只要是有罪供述,也有可能属于重复供述问题。非法的前次供述和合法的重复供述是本文研究的基础,如果重复供述是非法的,便能直接适用非法证据排除规则进行排除,也就无需对重复供述是否应该排除以及哪些供述应该排除的问题进行研究。对于重复供述是否应该排除,目前有三种观点：一种观点认为只要第一次有罪供述是非法取得,那么其后的重复供述就应该排除且应该全部排除。一种观点认为重复供述不应该排除,因为前次的非法取供已经被非法证据排除规则予以排除,.该次排除行为就是对非法取供行为的一次评价,同一行为只应该被评价一次,其后的重复供述不应该被再次评价。还有一种观点认为重复供述排除与否要结合前次非法取供对后续重复供述的波及力,再根据该波及力的影响来进行判断。前次非法取证对重复供述的实际影响是重复供述是否应该排除的决定性因素。在判断重复供述是否具有可采性时需要对该供述的自愿性,合法性和可靠性作出综合考量。
[Abstract]:Repeated confession means that the interrogator obtains the suspect's guilty confession by the way of the previous illegal interrogation, and then obtains the suspect's guilty confession by the legal interrogation. The repetition of confession is not only the repetition of the content of the repeated confession, but also the influence of the previous illegal means on the acquisition of the restatement and the internal connection between the two, which is the essence of the repeated confession that needs to be excluded. While the second confession was obtained in the presence of a suspect in a panic over the previous illegal confession, although the content of the restatement may have gone beyond or even changed the content of the previous confession, as long as it is a guilty confession, It may also be a question of repeated statements. Illegal previous statements and legal repeated statements are the basis of this study. If repeated confessions are illegal, the exclusion rules of illegal evidence can be directly applied to exclude them. There is no need to study whether repeated statements should be excluded and which statements should be excluded. There are three views on whether the repeated confession should be excluded. One view is that as long as the first guilty confession is obtained illegally, then the subsequent repeated confession should be excluded and should be completely excluded. One view is that repetition of statements should not be excluded, as the previous unlawful taking of evidence has been excluded by the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence. The exclusion behavior is an evaluation of the illegal taking of evidence, the same behavior should only be evaluated once, and the subsequent repeated statements should not be re-evaluated. There is also a view that the exclusion of repeated confession should be combined with the previous illegal confession on the subsequent repeated confession sweep force, and then according to the impact of this force to judge. The actual influence of the previous illegal evidence on repeated confessions is the decisive factor of whether repeated confessions should be excluded. It is necessary to consider the voluntary, legality and reliability of the repeated statement in order to determine whether it is admissible or not.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】