亲属免证特权:究竟谁的权利谁之义务

发布时间：2018-06-13 12:36

本文选题：亲属免证特权 + 质证　；参考：《学术论坛》2015年12期

【摘要】：亲属免证特权是刑事诉讼中一项重要的诉讼权利。我国《刑事诉讼法》第188条初步确立了亲属免证特权。然而,由于立法规定的模糊性和不完整性,仅强制将亲属免证特权归属于亲属证人,而未对被追诉人的亲属免证特权予以必要的关注。同时,在司法实践中还存在亲属免证特权与被告人质证权之间的冲突、亲属免证特权的适用主体过于狭窄、立法缺乏例外规定等问题。为了更好地理解和适用《刑事诉讼法》第188条之规定,在明确权属方面:应当明确规定亲属免证特权的权属、合理定位亲属免证特权的法律性质以及重新划定亲属免证特权的主体范围;在保障权利方面:应当摈弃单一的诉讼目的,树立多元化的诉讼价值观、确立直接言词原则以及设立相应的告知程序。
[Abstract]:The privilege of exemption of relatives is an important litigation right in criminal proceedings. Article 188 of Criminal procedure Law establishes the privilege of exemption of relatives. However, due to the vagueness and incompleteness of the legislation, the privilege of exemption of relatives is only assigned to the witnesses of relatives, and no necessary attention is paid to the privilege of exemption of relatives of the accused. At the same time, there are still some problems in the judicial practice, such as the conflict between the privilege of relative exemption and the right of cross-examination of the defendant, the narrow application of the privilege of exemption of relatives and the lack of exceptions in legislation, etc. In order to better understand and apply the provisions of article 188 of the Code of Criminal procedure, with regard to the definition of tenure: it should be made clear that the right of relatives to exemption from certification should be clearly defined, Reasonable positioning of the legal nature of relatives exemption privilege and redelimiting the scope of the subject of relatives exemption privileges; in terms of safeguarding rights: we should abandon the single purpose of litigation and establish a pluralistic value of litigation. Establish the principle of direct words and establish the corresponding communication procedures.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“刑事诉讼法解释学的原理及运用研究”(14AFX014)
【分类号】：D925.2

【共引文献】