政府信息公开行政诉讼问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-14 14:21

本文选题：政府信息公开 + 知情权　；参考：《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在社会政治文明高速发展的今天,法治作为一种顺应时代发展的治国理政重要方式也越来越得到重视。政府信息公开就是在改变政府职能,推动政府法治化建设这个大环境下产生的。保证政府依法公开信息有利于保障公民知情权的落实,而公民知情权的有效保障也能有效推动政府的依法行政。但不容忽视的是,我国这项制度的法律基础较为薄弱及政府部门公开信息的意识不强都导致了公开政府信息的目的即对公民知情权的保障难以实现,此时对于知情权的救济也就尤为重要和必不可少了。政府信息公开的行政诉讼制度作为对公民知情权的救济已经在很多国家发展到一个较为完善的阶段。而我国在这方面的法律制度建设起步较晚,各项规定也不太成熟,在实践过程中还存在很多问题,也致使公民在维护自己知情权时面对很多困难。本文在立足我国政府信息公开各项诉讼制度与实践的基础上进行研究,针对在诉讼过程中出现的较为突出的问题,深入分析各项问题并试图找到解决这些问题的对策。首先是对于政府信息公开诉讼的一般理论进行介绍,简要概述有关的基本概念和重要特征,同时探讨其所涉及的法理依据和法律价值,引申出对这一法律问题研究的重要意义,为下文相关问题的展开奠定理论基础。其次,通过对典型案例进行介绍分析,简要梳理出目前我国政府信息公开诉讼在发展过程中取得的成就以及存在的不足,为引出下文具体问题的分析奠定基础。首要的就是受案范围的界定问题,对于哪些案件应该受理,哪些不属于受案范围实践中还存在很多争议,对这一问题的准确界定对于政府信息公开诉讼目的的实现至关重要。实践中还存在的一个较为突出的问题就是关于例外信息的认定问题,在法院审理过程中由于例外信息的认定不明确会使法官无法判定案件所涉及的信息是否属于不予公开的范围。与受案范围密切相关的是关于诉讼中原告与被告的资格认定问题,准确界定当事人资格能有效保护公众的权益也能有效监督行政行为;在对受案范围与原被告资格的界定问题进行分析的基础上,进一步探究我国信息公开诉讼中存在的原被告双方的举证责任分配问题。最后,就实践中出现的突出问题结合我国的实际情况提出改善的建议,以此保证建立起更加健全的政府信息公开的行政诉讼法律制度。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of social political civilization, more and more attention has been paid to the rule of law as an important way of governing the country in accordance with the development of the times. The publicity of government information is produced under the environment of changing government functions and promoting the construction of government by law. Ensuring the government to disclose information according to law is conducive to the implementation of citizens' right to know, and the effective guarantee of citizens' right to know can also effectively promote the administration of government according to law. However, it can not be ignored that the weak legal basis of this system and the weak awareness of the public information of the government departments lead to the difficulty of realizing the purpose of the disclosure of government information, that is, the protection of citizens' right to know. At this time for the right to know the relief is particularly important and essential. As a relief to citizens' right to know, the administrative litigation system of government information disclosure has developed to a relatively perfect stage in many countries. However, the construction of legal system in this aspect of our country started late, the provisions are not very mature, there are still many problems in the process of practice, which makes citizens face a lot of difficulties in safeguarding their right to know. Based on the litigation system and practice of government information disclosure in our country, this paper makes a thorough analysis of the various problems and tries to find the countermeasures to solve these problems in view of the outstanding problems in the process of litigation. First of all, it introduces the general theory of public government information litigation, briefly summarizes the basic concepts and important characteristics, discusses the legal basis and legal value involved, and extends the significance of the research on this legal issue. To lay a theoretical foundation for the following related issues. Secondly, through the introduction and analysis of typical cases, this paper briefly combs out the achievements and shortcomings in the development process of the government information publicity litigation in our country at present, which lays a foundation for the analysis of the following specific problems. The first is to define the scope of the case, which cases should be accepted, which is not part of the scope of the case in practice there are many disputes, the accurate definition of this issue for the realization of the goal of public government information litigation is very important. One of the more prominent problems in practice is the identification of exceptional information. In the course of the court hearing, the judge can not judge whether the information involved in the case belongs to the scope of not public because of the uncertainty of the identification of the exceptional information. Closely related to the scope of the case is the qualification of the plaintiff and the defendant in the litigation, the accurate definition of the qualification of the parties can effectively protect the rights and interests of the public, and can effectively supervise administrative actions; Based on the analysis of the definition of the scope of the case and the qualification of the original defendant, this paper further explores the distribution of burden of proof between the original defendant and the original defendant in the information disclosure litigation in China. Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the outstanding problems in practice combined with the actual situation of our country, so as to ensure the establishment of a more sound legal system of administrative litigation of government information disclosure.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】