执行力的正当性基础及其制度展开

发布时间：2018-06-15 10:59

本文选题：执行力 + 执行名义　；参考：《国家检察官学院学报》2016年04期

【摘要】：执行力的正当性基础有别于既判力,正当程序保障下的自我归责原则作为既判力的正当性基础,仅能成为赋予生效法律文书以执行力的不充分且不必要条件。已经正当程序保障的确定债权,因不存在再事争议的常规救济途径,具备赋予执行力的正当性基础。虽未经正当程序保障但当事人对债权不存在实质性争议的推定债权,因债权成立且合法具有高度盖然性,在保留必要后置性程序保障的基础上,具备赋予其强制执行力的正当性基础。鉴于我国缺乏执行文与债务人异议之诉制度,执行力的赋予、消减及其与禁诉效力之间的关系均不能简单套用德日相关规定,而有必要予以深入检讨。
[Abstract]:The justifiable basis of executive power is different from the res judicata. The principle of self imputation under the guarantee of due process is the basis for the justification of the res judicata, and it can only be an inadequate and unnecessary condition for the enforcement of the effective legal instrument. The justifiable basis of executive power. Although the presumption claims of the parties do not have substantial disputes over the creditor's rights without due process, the creditor's claim is established and legally has a high degree of probability. On the basis of preserving the necessary postposition guarantee, it has a positive basis for endowing its enforcement power. In view of the lack of implementation of the text and debtor in our country The relationship between the dissenting complaint system, the executive power, the reduction and the effect of the prohibition of prosecution can not be simply applied to the relevant provisions of Germany and Japan, but it is necessary to review it in depth.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【基金】：贵州省哲学社会科学规划课题“审判权与执行权的分离与协作研究”(16GZQN01) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国强制执行法体系研究”(12JJD820012)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】