刑事诉讼审前会议制度研究

发布时间：2018-06-15 13:17

本文选题：审前会议 + 审前审查　；参考：《广西民族大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：自从“审前会议制度”在《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》(以下简称“新法”)中得到确立。其就成为了学术界讨论的热点话题,因为其在我国司法体制中具有开创性的价值。通过《最高人民法院关于执行《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》若干问题的解释》(以下简称最高法司法解释)对“审前会议制度”的阐述,说明其既具有实体性审查的作用也具有程序性审查的意义。在这一制度建立之前,法院不介入审前程序,也没有控、辩、审三方参与的刑事诉讼构造,这就导致了行政化特别明显。及其不利于辩护权的行使,尤其是对非法证据的排除,这些都被迫推迟到法院的开庭审理之中。经过这一次的改革,辩护人的辩护意见就可以在庭审前提出。这种诉讼化渠道的拓宽,更好的保障了人权,是审判的一大进步。但是对于审前会议的具体流程,我国的立法之中还无涉及。本文从审前会议制度出发,采取比较研究的方法,在对与之相类似的英美法系预审程序、德国中间程序等研究的基础上,以新刑事诉讼法内容和最高法司法解释为依据,着重探讨审前会议制度的具体内容,制度价值、科学体系构建等方面,以完善审前会议制度,使其与既有的审前审查程序相互配合,力求建立起符合国情的预审程序,使刑事司法更进一步。
[Abstract]:The system of pretrial meeting has been established in the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the New Law). It has become a hot topic in academic circles because of its pioneering value in China's judicial system. Through the interpretation of several issues concerning the implementation of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China by the Supreme people's Court (hereinafter referred to as the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Law), It shows that it not only has the function of substantive examination but also has the significance of procedural review. Before the establishment of this system, the court did not intervene in the pretrial procedure, nor did it have the criminal procedure structure in which the three parties participated in the prosecution, defense and trial. It is not conducive to the exercise of the right to defence, especially the exclusion of illegal evidence, which has to be postponed to the court session. With this reform, the defender's defence can be presented before the trial. This widening of litigation channels, better protection of human rights, is a major progress of the trial. However, the specific process of the pretrial meeting, our legislation has not been involved. Starting from the system of pretrial meeting, this paper adopts the method of comparative study, on the basis of the research of the similar preliminary procedure in common law system and the intermediate procedure in Germany, based on the content of the new criminal procedure law and the judicial interpretation of the supreme law. Focusing on the specific content, system value and scientific system construction of the pretrial conference system, in order to perfect the pretrial conference system, make it cooperate with the existing pretrial review procedure, and strive to establish a pre-trial procedure in accordance with the national conditions, To further the administration of criminal justice.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】