论民事非法证据排除规则的适用

发布时间：2018-06-17 11:02

本文选题：民事非法证据 + 实体规则　；参考：《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：法院裁判案件以事实为依据，而民事诉讼中的事实应当是经过认定的证据予以证明的事实，离开了证据，认定案件事实便无从谈起，，法官裁判案件也就犹如空中楼阁，因而证据制度在民事诉讼制度中具有极其重要的地位。而在证据制度中，民事非法证据排除规则又居于重要地位。2002年最高人民法院颁布《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》（以下简称《民事证据规定》），随后理论界对民事非法证据排除规则的讨论如雨后春笋，其中不乏著名学者的真知灼见。理论界的学说理论已日趋成熟，但实务界中对该规则的适用却出现了纷繁复杂的局面，甚至同案不同判。因而本文将另辟蹊径，以实证分析、域外比较研究、民事法律与刑事法律的比较考察为主要研究方法，以现有的民事法律规范为主要研究基础，重点论述我国民事非法证据排除规则的适用问题。
[Abstract]:The court adjudicates a case on the basis of facts, and the facts in civil proceedings should be facts that have been proved by the recognized evidence. Without the evidence, there will be no way to identify the facts of the case, and the judge will judge the case as if it were a castle in the air. Therefore, the evidence system plays an extremely important role in the civil litigation system. And in the system of evidence, In 2002, the Supreme people's Court promulgated some provisions on evidence in Civil procedure (hereinafter referred to as "Civil evidence provisions"), and then the rules of exclusion of civil illegal evidence were issued by the theorists. The discussions have sprung up. Among them, there are many famous scholars' insights. The theoretical theory has matured gradually, but the application of this rule in practice has appeared a complicated situation, even different judgments in the same case. Therefore, this paper will take the empirical analysis, the foreign comparative study, the comparative investigation of civil law and criminal law as the main research methods, and the existing civil law norms as the main research basis. This paper focuses on the application of the rule of exclusion of civil illegal evidence in China.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】