我国民事执行听证制度研究

发布时间：2018-06-17 15:00

本文选题：民事执行 + 听证制度　；参考：《海南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事执行听证制度是为了保证民事执行程序公正而推出的一项重要措施,从一开始在一些法院试点运行,到如今已经历时数载,在此过程中取得了初步的成效。但是,由于至今还没有形成一部规范的、统一的民事执行听证程序的法律规则,导致很多法院的民事执行听证程序在实际运行中出现了很多问题,因此,关于民事执行听证制度的具体法律规定还有待进一步完善。我国民事执行听证制度存在着诸多问题,主要有适用民事执行听证的范围不统一、民事执行听证未做到真正的裁执分离、民事执行听证程序不规范、民事执行听证容易导致执行程序久拖不执、合议庭的作用形同虚设、民事执行听证的证据规则不统一。出现上述这些问题的原因,主要包括缺乏统一的执行听证法律体系、长期的重实体轻程序观念以及执行法官的综合素质普遍不高等因素。因此,为保障民事执行当事人的合法权利、完善民事执行救济、实现公平与效率,对我国民事执行听证制度进行进一步的完善是有非常大的必要性的。并且,各地法院的实践为执行听证提供了良好的基础,司法改革为实施执行听证提供了良好的法律环境,现行的法律机制使得执行听证制度具有可能性,这些都为完善我国的民事执行听证制度提供了可行性。在对我国的民事执行听证制度进行完善的过程中,必须要遵循民事执行听证程序公开原则、公正与效率原则、民事执行听证职能分离原则以及民事执行听证适度原则,从调整执行听证的适用范围、建立真正裁执分离的机制、规范具体的民事执行听证程序、防止当事人滥用听证程序、完善重大事项合议决定制度以及建立民事执行听证制度配套的证据规则等几个方面来完善我国的民事执行听证制度。
[Abstract]:The civil execution hearing system is an important measure to guarantee the fairness of the civil execution procedure. It has been running in some courts at the beginning and has been running for several years. In this process, it has achieved initial results. However, due to the lack of a standardized, unified legal rule of the civil execution hearing procedure, many problems have arisen in the actual operation of the civil execution hearing procedure in many courts. The specific legal provisions on the civil execution hearing system need to be further improved. There are many problems in the civil execution hearing system of our country. The main problems are that the scope of the civil execution hearing is not uniform, the civil execution hearing is not truly separated, the procedure of the civil execution hearing is not standardized, The civil execution hearing is easy to cause the execution procedure to be delayed for a long time, the function of the collegial panel is void, and the rules of evidence of the civil execution hearing are not uniform. The reasons for these problems mainly include the lack of a unified legal system of executive hearing, the long-term emphasis on substance and procedure, and the general lack of comprehensive quality of executive judges, and so on. Therefore, in order to protect the legal rights of civil enforcement parties, improve civil enforcement relief, achieve fairness and efficiency, it is necessary to further improve the civil execution hearing system in China. Moreover, the practice of local courts provides a good basis for the implementation of the hearing, judicial reform provides a good legal environment for the implementation of the hearing, and the current legal mechanism makes the system of executive hearing possible. All these have provided the feasibility for perfecting the civil execution hearing system of our country. In the process of perfecting the civil execution hearing system in our country, we must follow the principles of openness of civil execution hearing procedure, fairness and efficiency, separation of civil execution hearing function and moderate civil execution hearing. To regulate the scope of application of the executive hearing, to establish a mechanism for the separation of true adjudication and enforcement, to standardize the specific civil execution hearing procedures, and to prevent the parties from abusing the hearing procedures, To perfect the civil execution hearing system of our country, we should perfect the decision system of major matters and establish the supporting evidence rules of civil execution hearing system.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】