当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

刑事诉讼法中一事不再理原则的适用

发布时间:2018-06-17 14:05

  本文选题:一事不再理 + 人权保障 ; 参考:《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:一事不再理原则,其作为刑事审判的一项基本原则,是世界上发达国家都认可并且予以接受的制度,在世界范围内已经形成广泛的共识。它从古罗马法“一案不二讼”的法律制度中启源,后经过多少年的不断发展和深入沉积,已经演变为了现代刑事诉讼中的一项不可缺少的重要原则,不但世界上大部分主要国家的刑事诉讼法己经明确的把它认定为刑事诉讼法的一项基本原则,并且一些世界性人权公约也把它视为刑事诉讼的一项基本的原则加以明确规定。因此,两大法系分别沿着不通的方向发展,分成大陆法系即既判力形式的一事不再理原则与英美法系中禁止双重危险原则,两大法系都明确的规定了不允许对被告人的同一个法律事实予以两次追诉。但是二者的区别在于大陆法系的一事不再理原则突出的强调了案件判决既判力的稳定性,而英美法系的禁止双重危险原则则重点强调关注对被告人人权的多方面保护。本文通过四部分论述了刑事诉讼中一事不再理原则的适用。第一部分通过对一事不再理原则法理基础的详细阐述,从法律层面上深入了解了一事不再理原则的具体内涵。第二部分,通过对两大法系多方面的对比,阐述了两大法系对一事不再理问题研究现状的不同角度,更加深入了解一事不再理原则在世界范围内的适用情况。第三部分则阐述了一事不再理原则在我国诉讼程序的各个方面即起诉、审判、再审阶段的适用情况,深入分析了我国对一事不再理原则的法律适用态度。第四部分则深入探讨了一事不再理原则在我国的立法现状以及立法完善、建议。文章系统分析和论证了现代意义上刑事诉讼一事不再理原则的理论基础和法律程·序上的适用情况,以及在现代刑事诉讼多元化价值取向、自由、安全和效率的影响下,一事不再理原则在适用中的平衡和调整。我国从古至今就没有确立一事不再理制度,但在目前,建立我国一事不再理原则已经是一种大势所趋,更何况我国当前的法制环境已经成熟,完全可以建成一事不再理原则。当然,要想建成我国的一事不再理原则就必须从我国最基本的国情作为出发点,因为和大陆法系相类似,那么可以考虑把大陆法系中一事不再理原则作为基础,与此同时借鉴英美法系的禁止双重危险原则中适用于我国的好的一面。建立一事不再理原则是一种系统的大工程,不仅要转变人们的传统习惯思想而且要建立一套完善的配套制度加以辅助。
[Abstract]:As a basic principle of criminal trial, the principle of non bis in idem is recognized and accepted by developed countries in the world, and has formed a wide consensus in the world. It originated from the legal system of "one case without two cases" in ancient Roman law. After many years of continuous development and deep deposition, it has evolved into an indispensable and important principle in modern criminal proceedings. Not only the criminal procedure law of most major countries in the world has been clearly recognized as a basic principle of the criminal procedure law, but also some universal human rights conventions regard it as a basic principle of criminal procedure. Therefore, the two major legal systems developed in the direction of impassability, divided into the civil law system, that is, the res judicata non bis in idem principle and the prohibition of double risk principle in the Anglo-American law system. The two legal systems clearly stipulate that the same legal fact of the defendant is not allowed to be prosecuted twice. However, the difference between the two is that the principle of non bis in idem in civil law system emphasizes the stability of res judicata, while the principle of double risk in common law system emphasizes the protection of human rights of defendants in many aspects. This paper discusses the application of the principle of non bis in idem in criminal procedure through four parts. The first part, through the detailed elaboration of the legal basis of the principle of non bis in idem, deeply understands the concrete connotation of the principle of non bis in idem from the legal level. The second part, through the comparison of two legal systems in many aspects, elaborated the two legal systems on the issue of the two different angles of research on the issue of non bis in idem, a more in-depth understanding of the principle of non bis in idem in the world scope of application. The third part expounds the application of the principle of non bis in idem in all aspects of the litigation procedure in our country, that is, prosecution, trial and retrial, and analyzes deeply the legal applicable attitude of our country to the principle of non bis in idem. In the fourth part, the author deeply discusses the legislative status quo and the legislative perfection of the principle of non bis in idem in our country. This paper systematically analyzes and demonstrates the theoretical basis of the principle of non bis in idem in modern criminal procedure and the application of the legal procedure, and under the influence of diversified value orientation, freedom, safety and efficiency of modern criminal procedure. The balance and adjustment of the principle of non bis in idem in application. Since ancient times, China has not established a matter no longer reason system, but at present, the establishment of our country no matter no reason principle has been a general trend, let alone the current legal environment of our country has matured, we can complete the principle of no matter no reason. Of course, if we want to build the principle of non bis in idem in our country, we must start from the most basic national conditions of our country, because it is similar to the civil law system, so we can consider the principle of non bis in idem in the civil law system as the basis. At the same time, draw lessons from the Anglo-American law system of the prohibition of double-hazard principle applicable to China's good side. It is a systematic project to establish the principle of no matter principle. It is necessary not only to change people's traditional habits but also to establish a complete set of supporting systems to assist them.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 张贞;;从一事不再理原则反思我国刑事再审程序的完善[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年01期

2 徐莹;;从一事不再理原则看我国的刑事再审程序[J];太原师范学院学报(社会科学版);2007年05期

3 陈芬娟;;一事不再理原则与我国刑事再审程序之完善[J];嘉兴学院学报;2006年S1期

4 赵钟;刘晖;;一事不再理与我国刑事再审程序的重构[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2006年04期

5 胡铭;;联合国刑事司法准则视野下的再审程序改革——兼论一事不再理原则及其例外在我国的确立[J];研究生法学;2005年01期

6 秦宗文;一事不再理原则与我国刑事程序改革研究[J];学术研究;2004年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 高贺仁;论我国刑事再审程序的改革与完善[D];浙江工业大学;2012年

2 张道伟;一事不再理原则研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年

3 刘立新;一事不再理原则的确立与我国刑事再审程序的重构[D];中国政法大学;2009年

4 蔡震宇;一事不再理的客观范围研究[D];浙江工商大学;2008年

5 陈建辉;论刑事诉讼中一事不再理原则[D];湘潭大学;2007年

6 马蓓蕾;刑事诉讼一事不再理原则研究[D];安徽大学;2006年

7 查小燕;论刑事诉讼中的一事不再理原则[D];四川大学;2006年

8 汤茂定;刑事诉讼一事不再理原则研究[D];南京师范大学;2005年

9 毛忠强;刑事诉讼一事不再理原则研究[D];武汉大学;2005年

10 崔莉霞;论一事不再理原则[D];西南政法大学;2005年



本文编号:2031315

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2031315.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户409f2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com