监察委员会调查活动性质研究--以山西省第一案为研究对象

发布时间：2018-06-20 04:46

本文选题：监察体制改革 + 调查权　；参考：以山西省第一案为研究对象

【摘要】：山西省监察委员会日前对某国企高管采取了留置措施,这是山西省监察体制改革以来采取留置措施查办的首起案件。在密切关注试点地区监察体制改革发展动向同时,还有必要对这一事件作宪法层面的冷思考。调查活动的性质是行政调查权还是刑事侦查权?二者差异是什么?留置措施的现实意义是什么?监察委员会不经检察院批准而采取留置措施意味着什么?这对人民检察院有什么影响?恰当的路径应当如何?国家重大改革应当于法有据,更应于宪有据。
[Abstract]:The Shanxi Provincial Supervisory Commission adopted the retention measure against a state-owned enterprise executive a few days ago, the first case to be investigated by the Shanxi Provincial Supervision Commission since the reform of the supervisory system. While paying close attention to the development trend of the supervision system reform in the pilot area, it is also necessary to make a cold thinking on the constitutional aspect of this incident. Is the nature of investigation activities administrative investigation power or criminal investigation power? What's the difference? What is the practical significance of the retention measure? What does it mean for the Commission to take retention measures without the approval of the Public Prosecutor's Office? What effect does this have on the people's procuratorates? What should be the proper path? Major state reform should be based on the law and even more on the constitution.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】