民事诉讼举证时限制度分析

发布时间：2018-06-22 21:32

本文选题：民事举证时限 + 证据失权　；参考：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：从上世纪末开始,我国经济发展速度增快,社会民事主体之间纠纷也越来越多,人民法院受案量自然也成正比,不断上涨。民事诉讼举证时限制度发展进程从“无举证期间和证据失权”到“规范的举证期间和证据失权”,再到新民事诉讼法及其司法解释中的“证据随时提出主义”的规定,有其发展的国情基础。作为一项有价值的民事诉讼制度,举证时限有其实施的重要价值和功能,然而严格规范的证据失权在司法实践进展中并非畅通无阻,在遇到难以抉择的实体正义和程序正义的冲突后,我国对该制度的立法和司法实践已沦为“名存实亡”,已然失去了作为核心的证据失权制度价值,是应该继续完善该制度,还是予以抛弃,是我们应该思考的。本文将通过以下四个方面对举证时限相关制度予以研究。该制度存在的理论基础和在我国的立法及实施变化过程将首先予以分析,包括举证时限制度的概念、存在的必要性和重要性等理论方面的探讨,该制度在我国立法变化的背景及其相关规定。接下来对英美法系和大陆法系典型国家的举证期间、证据失权制度进行分析对比,包括对英、美、法、德四个国家的举证时限相关制度予以展示,并简要的进行了探讨比较。再次分析了该制度在我国的运行现状和立法原因,包括目前我国举证时限制度的立法规定和运行状况,严格举证时限制度在我国不再继续运用的背景和一系列原因。最后提出了完善我国证据失权制度的浅见,包括在我国司法环境下应该选择的模式和具体在立法以及配套制度方面的完善。举证时限制度作为一项重要的制度,虽在我国出现了“水土不服”的状况,但我们不应该抛弃他,而是应该选择适合我国国情的举证时限制度模式,因此提出对我国举证时限制度的完善建议。
[Abstract]:Since the end of the last century, the economic development of our country has increased rapidly, and the disputes between the civil subjects of the society have become more and more, and the number of cases received by the people's courts has naturally increased in proportion to that of the people's courts. The development process of the system of the time limit of proof in civil proceedings is from "no proof period and evidence losing right" to "normative proof period and evidence losing right", and then to the provision of "evidence at any time" in the new civil procedure law and its judicial interpretation. There is a national basis for its development. As a valuable civil action system, the time limit of proof has its important value and function. However, the strictly standardized evidence loss is not unobstructed in the progress of judicial practice. In the face of the conflict between substantive justice and procedural justice, the legislation and judicial practice of this system have been reduced to "exist in name", and have lost the value of the system of loss of power as the core, so we should continue to improve the system. We should think about whether to abandon it or not. This paper will study the relevant system of the time limit of proof through the following four aspects. The theoretical basis of this system and the process of legislation and implementation changes in our country will be analyzed first, including the concept of the system of time of proof, the necessity and importance of existence, and so on. The background of the legislative changes in China and its relevant provisions. Then it analyzes and compares the evidence loss of power system in the typical countries of Anglo-American law system and continental law system, including the relevant systems of the time limit of proof in four countries: Britain, the United States, France and Germany, and makes a brief discussion and comparison. Then it analyzes the current situation of the system in our country and the reasons for its legislation, including the legislative provisions and operating conditions of the present system of the time limit of proof in our country, the background and a series of reasons for the strict application of the system of the time limit of proof in our country. Finally, the author puts forward some views on how to perfect the system of evidence loss, including the mode that should be chosen in the judicial environment of our country and the perfection of legislation and supporting system. As an important system, the system of proof time limit has appeared in our country, but we should not abandon it, but should choose the mode of proof time limit system suitable to our country's national conditions. Therefore, the paper puts forward some suggestions to perfect the system of proof time limit in our country.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】