公众参审的实践进路之探讨

发布时间：2018-06-29 05:14

本文选题：公众参审 + 正当性　；参考：《中国刑事法杂志》2013年10期

【摘要】：法律本身蕴含民意,但不自动表达民意,司法审判是表达民意的重要渠道之一。人民陪审制作为我国特色的公众参审制度长期陷入"僵而不死"的困境之中,亦即表现为"陪而不审"、"审而不议"、"议而不决"的情形。不少地方法院为此开展了关于公众参审的改革尝试,虽取得一定成效,然而改革多数呈现任意性、无秩序性、不持续性的特点。究其原因,除了改革者对公众参审正当性及核心要义认识不足之外,缺乏实现公众参审进路的"顶层设计"亦为重要因素。厘清公众参审的正当性依据和核心要义、探索实现公众参审进路的"顶层设计"具有重要的现实意义。其实践进路有:以"完善五项制度"为核心,建立完善的法官职业保障制度;以"畅通言论自由"为核心,建立获取民意、甄别民意畅通管道;以"三项制度公开"为核心,建立深度有致的司法公开管道;以"重塑人民陪审制"为核心,建立合法有序的民主审判管道。
[Abstract]:Law itself contains public opinion, but does not automatically express public opinion, judicial trial is one of the important channels to express public opinion. The system of public participation made by the people jury as the characteristic of our country has been in the dilemma of "stiff but not dead" for a long time, that is, the situation of "accompanying without trial", "trial without discussion" and "discussing but indecision". For this reason, many local courts have tried to reform public participation in trial. Although some achievements have been made, most of the reforms have the characteristics of arbitrariness, disorderly and unsustainable. In addition to the lack of reformers' understanding of the legitimacy and key points of public participation, the lack of a "top design" for public participation is also an important factor. It is of great practical significance to clarify the legitimate basis and core meaning of public participation, and to explore the "top design" of public participation. Its practical approaches are as follows: taking "perfecting the five systems" as the core, establishing a perfect professional security system for judges, taking "freedom of speech" as the core, establishing channels for obtaining public opinion and discriminating public opinion, taking "three systems open" as the core, To establish a deep and effective channel for judicial publicity and to establish a legal and orderly democratic trial channel with the core of "remoulding the people's jury system".
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;江苏省南通市中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】