对我国小额诉讼制度的反思与重构

发布时间：2018-07-03 15:04

本文选题：小额诉讼制度 + 比较借鉴　；参考：《宁夏大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：第二次世界大战之后,为解决诉讼膨胀问题,许多发达国家陆续展开以追求司法公正和司法效率均衡为主题的民事司法改革运动,期中,小额诉讼制度凭借其特有的低成本、高效率等特点解决了大量的小额轻微民事纠纷,有利于缓解法院审判压力,有助于实现即时审判等价值优势被各发达国家纷纷积极采用。我国的司法体制改革呼声由来已久,在民事司法领域有关审判制度改革研究也不是新鲜话题了,随着《新民事诉讼法》的问世,小额诉讼制度也终于在历经数年的理论探索和实践摸索的基础上以法律规定的形式确立了。相关规定的设计,是对我国前期研究的总结和对我国传统审判程序一大创新,受到了法学界乃至普通民众的热切关注,期间有关该规定的不足也受到热议。本文的写作主要由以下四方面内容组成,首先是制度概述,针对小额诉讼制度的概念、特征和价值目标等内容做介绍；其次是小额诉讼制度的比较解读,主要介绍具有代表性的几个国家和地区关于小额诉讼制度的运行情况并与我国实践结合,对比差异并小结借鉴之处；第三部分总结目前理论和实践两方面研究中存在的问题并对原因进行反思；文章最后部分理论联系实际,在民事诉讼法基础上提出运行的完善建议。
[Abstract]:After the second World War, in order to solve the problem of litigation expansion, many developed countries launched the civil judicial reform movement, which focused on the pursuit of judicial justice and the balance of judicial efficiency. In the interim, the small claims litigation system with its unique low cost. The characteristics of high efficiency have solved a large number of minor civil disputes, which is helpful to relieve the pressure of court trial, and help to realize the value advantage of instant trial, which has been adopted actively by developed countries one after another. China's judicial system reform has a long history, and the research on the judicial system reform in the field of civil justice is no longer a new topic. With the advent of the "New Civil procedure Law", The system of minor action has finally been established in the form of legal regulations on the basis of several years of theoretical exploration and practical exploration. The design of the relevant regulations is a summary of the previous research in our country and a great innovation to the traditional trial procedure of our country, which has been paid close attention to by the legal circles and even the ordinary people, and the insufficiency of this provision has also been hot discussed during this period. The writing of this paper is mainly composed of the following four aspects: firstly, it is an overview of the system, which introduces the concept, characteristics and value objectives of the small claims system; secondly, it is the comparative interpretation of the small claims litigation system. This paper mainly introduces the operation of several representative countries and regions on the system of small claims and combines it with the practice of our country, compares the differences and summarizes the points for reference. The third part summarizes the problems existing in the current theoretical and practical studies and reflects on the reasons. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the operation on the basis of the civil procedure law.
【学位授予单位】：宁夏大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】