论刑事案件审判阶段律师庭外言论的规制

发布时间：2018-07-04 22:53

本文选题：刑事审判 + 律师　；参考：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：域外法治发达国家在实践中逐渐形成了两种针对律师庭外言论的规制模式即严格禁止模式和底线标准模式,但其法理基础本身存在固有缺陷,在某些语境中律师庭外言论概念会混淆。隔音空间理论下律师庭外言论的分离规制模式弥补了前两种模式在律师庭外言论概念混淆、法理基础薄弱等缺陷,引入隔音空间理论有其合理性。应根据律师庭外言论所可能产生的法律后果将律师庭外言论进行类型化构建,并根据其法律后果的差异予以不同的规制。具体而言,隔音空间理论曾被学者用于描述和解释法律程序的某些特征。在刑事案件的诉讼程序中,隔音空间兼有封闭性与开放性的双重特征,这个空间需要外界与案件有关的人和事件等信息的进入,在另一端会产生具有终结意义的裁判结果。在隔音空间理论指导下构建出一个拟制的诉讼程序模型,根据其封闭性与开放性的特征辅以不同律师庭外言论对于诉讼程序所产生的具体影响来规制律师庭外言论或将成为一个有益的尝试。基于这样的思考,文章主要从以下五个部分展开论述:文章第一部分主要界定了律师庭外言论的概念和内涵,明确将刑事案件审判阶段的律师庭外言论作为文章探讨的重点。第二部分基于司法实践中典型案例的分析,阐明了律师庭外言论可能引发的若干问题及规制的必要性。第三部分从法理层面论述了律师庭外言论从不同角度可能涉及到的法益权衡问题,阐明了规制律师庭外言论需要考虑的若干法律关系。第四部分介绍了学界关于规制律师庭外言论的两种主要模式,包括严格禁止模式与底线标准模式。第五部分提出了基于隔音空间理论的分离规制模式,力图弥补前两种模式在律师庭外言论概念混淆、法理基础薄弱等方面的缺陷。
[Abstract]:In practice, developed countries with the rule of law outside the country have gradually formed two modes of regulation for lawyers' out-of-court speech, that is, the strict prohibition model and the bottom line standard mode, but the legal basis itself has inherent defects. In some contexts, the concept of a lawyer's speech out of court can be confused. Under the theory of soundproof space, the separation regulation model of lawyer's speech out of court makes up for the defects of the former two modes, such as the confusion of the concept of the former two kinds of speech out of court, the weak legal basis and so on, so it is reasonable to introduce the theory of soundproof space. According to the possible legal consequences of the lawyer's out-of-court speech, the lawyer's out-of-court speech should be typed and regulated differently according to the difference of its legal consequences. Specifically, the theory of soundproof space has been used by scholars to describe and explain some characteristics of legal procedures. In the procedure of criminal cases, the soundproof space has both the characteristics of closure and openness. This space needs the entry of the information about the case and other information, and will produce the final result at the other end. Under the guidance of soundproof space theory, a fictitious procedural model is constructed. According to its closed and open characteristics, it may be a beneficial attempt to regulate the lawyer's out-of-court speech with the specific influence of different lawyers' out-of-court speech on the proceedings. Based on this thinking, the article mainly discusses from the following five parts: the first part of the article mainly defines the concept and connotation of the lawyer's out-of-court speech, and explicitly focuses on the out-of-court speech of the lawyer in the criminal case trial stage. The second part, based on the analysis of typical cases in judicial practice, clarifies some problems and the necessity of regulation. The third part discusses the legal benefits tradeoff that lawyers' out-of-court speech may involve from different angles, and expounds some legal relations that should be considered in regulating lawyers' out-of-court speech. The fourth part introduces two main modes of regulating lawyers' speech out of court, including strict prohibition model and bottom line standard model. The fifth part puts forward the separation regulation model based on the theory of soundproof space, and tries to remedy the defects of the former two modes in the confusion of the concept of the lawyer's speech out of court, the weak legal basis and so on.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】