当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

我国法院诉讼调解制度研究

发布时间:2018-07-05 03:26

  本文选题:法院调解 + 诉讼调解 ; 参考:《复旦大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国的法院诉讼调解制度被誉为东方经验,是一项重要的司法制度,在中国有着源远流长的历史,它推动了社会主义和谐社会的建设,加快了经济的发展。但是随着市场经济的深入发展,法院诉讼调解制度的设计在面对越来越多样化的社会矛盾时,已经产生出许多问题。本文首先从法院诉讼调解制度的概念着手,分析我国的法院诉讼调解制度的具体内容、特征及价值功能。第二,比较我国台湾地区以及其他国家的调解制度,主要为:美国的附设调解制度及和解制度、德国的和解制度、日本的调停与诉讼和解制度以及我国台湾地区的和解制度。第三,对我国现行法院诉讼调解制度存在的现状及缺失进行分析研究。最后,结合我国台湾地区及他国先进经验,进行仔细的比较分析,借鉴其可取之处,结合我国法院诉讼调解自身特点,提出完善我国法院调解制度的建议,有效弥补我国法院诉讼调解制度的不足,包括调审分离;取消查明事实、分清是非的原则;明确合法原则;避免“强制调解”现在的大量产生;完善调解程序性规范以及明确调解协议的法律效力等,从原则性规定到具体程序的完善都提出了一些建议。
[Abstract]:China's court litigation mediation system, known as the oriental experience, is an important judicial system, which has a long history in China. It promotes the construction of a harmonious socialist society and speeds up the development of the economy. However, with the further development of market economy, the design of court litigation mediation system has produced many problems in the face of more and more diverse social contradictions. This paper begins with the concept of court litigation mediation system, and analyzes the concrete content, characteristics and value function of court litigation mediation system in our country. Secondly, the author compares the mediation systems in Taiwan and other countries, mainly as follows: the United States' affiliated mediation system and conciliation system, Germany's conciliation system, Japan's mediation and litigation conciliation system, and China's Taiwan region's conciliation system. Third, the present situation and deficiency of our country's current court litigation mediation system are analyzed and studied. Finally, according to the advanced experience of Taiwan and other countries, this paper makes a careful comparative analysis, draws lessons from its merits, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the court mediation system of our country, in combination with the characteristics of our country's court litigation mediation. Effectively make up for the deficiency of the mediation system of our country's court litigation, including the separation of trial and appeal, cancel the principle of finding out the facts and distinguish right from wrong, clarify the principle of legality, avoid the large amount of "compulsory mediation" at present; To perfect the procedural norms of mediation and clarify the legal effect of mediation agreement, some suggestions are put forward from the principle stipulation to the perfection of concrete procedure.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.14

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 李浩;;先行调解制度研究[J];江海学刊;2013年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 复旦大学法学院教授 博士生导师 章武生;[N];人民法院报;2013年



本文编号:2098716

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2098716.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户afa9d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com