汉代民事诉讼新论

发布时间：2018-07-06 10:13

本文选题：汉代 + 居延案例　；参考：《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年04期

【摘要】："寇恩案"、"赵宣案"、"死驹案"是研究汉代民事诉讼的珍贵史料,但对它们的解读一直充满着争议。焦点有:"寇恩案"是否存在民事问题刑事化处理的倾向?"赵宣案"为何追债的钱数与欠债数不匹配?"死驹案"的判决到底是什么性质?通过对居延汉简的全面调查,比堪类似案例,我们可以看到:"寇恩案"不存在民事问题刑事化的倾向,"赵宣案"的钱数不匹配是我们对追债次数估计不足所造成的假象,而"死驹案"的判决在主体上是民事性质。最后,结合张家山出土的《二年律令》,我们可以归纳出汉代民事诉讼的特征。这些特征表明:汉代民事诉讼和刑事诉讼有显著不同,并且已经进入了"依法审理"的发展阶段。
[Abstract]:Kohn case, Zhao Xuan case and Dead Ju case are valuable historical materials to study civil litigation in Han Dynasty, but their interpretation is always controversial. The focus is: is there a tendency to criminalize civil issues in the Cowen case? " Zhao Xuan case "Why the amount of money collected and debts do not match?" What is the nature of the death Ju case? Through a comprehensive investigation of the bamboo slips of Juyan Han Dynasty, we can see that there is no tendency to criminalize civil problems in the "Cohen case", and that the mismatch in the amount of money in the "Zhao Xuan case" is a false impression caused by our under-estimated number of debt collection times. And the judgment in the death-foal case is civil in subject. Finally, we can sum up the characteristics of civil litigation in Han Dynasty combined with the two-year law unearthed from Zhangjiashan. These characteristics show that the Han Dynasty civil proceedings and criminal proceedings are significantly different, and has entered the "trial according to law" stage of development.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学思勉人文高等研究院;
【基金】：2011年国家社科青年项目“中国早期民法的诠释”(11CZS009)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D929;D925.1

【参考文献】