行政诉讼受案范围的拓展
发布时间：2018-07-18 16:00
【摘要】：行政诉讼受案范围是指人民法院受理行政案件的范围。哪些行政行为具有可诉性，，直接关乎到公民权的救济以及司法权对行政权的监督范围。 根据目前我国《行政诉讼法》和相关司法解释的规定，我国行政诉讼受案范围采用的是混合式立法模式划定受案范围。首先以概括式作出原则性规定，再采用肯定式和否定式列举作出具体规定。这种模式在逻辑上违反了排中律的原则，造成了法官适用法律时犹豫不决。在借鉴国外先进国家关于受案范围的规定下，本人认为，行政诉讼受案范围不应当局限在具体行政行为的合法性审查方面，合理性审查也很有必要。此外，把抽象行政行为、内部行政行为、行政自由裁量行政行为、行政事实行为等几种行政行为列入可诉性行政行为的范围，对于扩大行政诉讼受案范围意义重大。对行政相对人的权益的保护，不能仅仅停留在“人身权、财产权”，宪法赋予的各种公民政治权利，例如教育权、休息权等，都应当收到司法保护。只有这样，才能从根本上彻底解决行政诉讼受案范围过窄的问题，充分有效的给行政相对人提供司法救济。 考虑到我国法制建设的现实状况，扩大受案范围不是无限制的扩大，本文适时的提出了扩大行政诉讼受案范围的界限。
[Abstract]:The scope of accepting cases in administrative proceedings refers to the scope of administrative cases accepted by the people's courts. Which administrative acts are actionable, directly related to the relief of civil rights and the scope of judicial supervision of administrative power. According to the provisions of Administrative procedure Law and related judicial interpretation, the range of administrative litigation cases in our country is defined by mixed legislative model. First of all, generalize the rules of principle, then use the positive and negative enumeration to make specific provisions. This pattern logically violates the principle of exclusion, causing judges to hesitate to apply the law. In the light of the provisions of foreign advanced countries on the scope of accepting cases, I believe that the scope of accepting cases in administrative proceedings should not be limited to the examination of the legality of specific administrative acts, and the examination of reasonableness is also very necessary. In addition, it is of great significance to include abstract administrative acts, internal administrative acts, administrative discretionary administrative acts, administrative factual acts and other administrative acts in the scope of actionable administrative acts. The protection of the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart should not only be confined to "personal rights, property rights", and all kinds of civil and political rights, such as the right to education and the right to rest, which are conferred by the Constitution, should all receive judicial protection. Only in this way can we solve the problem of too narrow range of cases in administrative litigation and provide judicial relief to administrative counterpart. Considering the reality of legal system construction in our country, expanding the scope of accepting a case is not an unlimited expansion, this paper puts forward the limits of expanding the scope of accepting a case in administrative litigation.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3
本文编号：2132415
[Abstract]:The scope of accepting cases in administrative proceedings refers to the scope of administrative cases accepted by the people's courts. Which administrative acts are actionable, directly related to the relief of civil rights and the scope of judicial supervision of administrative power. According to the provisions of Administrative procedure Law and related judicial interpretation, the range of administrative litigation cases in our country is defined by mixed legislative model. First of all, generalize the rules of principle, then use the positive and negative enumeration to make specific provisions. This pattern logically violates the principle of exclusion, causing judges to hesitate to apply the law. In the light of the provisions of foreign advanced countries on the scope of accepting cases, I believe that the scope of accepting cases in administrative proceedings should not be limited to the examination of the legality of specific administrative acts, and the examination of reasonableness is also very necessary. In addition, it is of great significance to include abstract administrative acts, internal administrative acts, administrative discretionary administrative acts, administrative factual acts and other administrative acts in the scope of actionable administrative acts. The protection of the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart should not only be confined to "personal rights, property rights", and all kinds of civil and political rights, such as the right to education and the right to rest, which are conferred by the Constitution, should all receive judicial protection. Only in this way can we solve the problem of too narrow range of cases in administrative litigation and provide judicial relief to administrative counterpart. Considering the reality of legal system construction in our country, expanding the scope of accepting a case is not an unlimited expansion, this paper puts forward the limits of expanding the scope of accepting a case in administrative litigation.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 王麟;重构行政诉讼受案范围的基本问题[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2004年04期
2 阎巍;;行政诉讼禁止判决的理论基础与制度构建[J];法律适用;2012年03期
3 林莉红;我国行政诉讼法学的研究状况及其发展趋势[J];法学评论;1998年03期
4 涂师铭;郭海龙;;行政合同争议的司法救济途径[J];法制与经济(下半月);2007年10期
5 斯琴;;试论行政诉讼的受案范围[J];前沿;2006年01期
6 曾祥华;人权:行政法的逻辑起点[J];政法论丛;2004年04期
7 章剑生;有关行政诉讼受案范围的几个理论问题探析[J];中国法学;1998年02期
本文编号：2132415
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2132415.html
