论中国行政法院制度之构建
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of administrative litigation system in China, it has played an important role in restricting administrative power, supervising the operation of administrative power and protecting the legal rights of administrative counterpart. With the change of the social environment, the legal environment of our country has also changed greatly. The malpractice of the administrative trial system in our country has become increasingly obvious: the independence of the administrative trial is insufficient, and it is difficult to accept the administrative litigation cases. Problems such as difficulty in execution have seriously affected the progress of administrative litigation in our country. In the face of the system dilemma of administrative litigation, it is urgent to reform the judicial system of our country. Article 18, paragraph 2, of the Administrative procedure Law provides for the establishment of administrative court system for our country. The establishment of the circuit court in 2015 will help to alleviate the malpractice of the current administrative trial system. However, the establishment of an independent administrative court is undoubtedly the most feasible way to solve the malpractice of administrative trial system. The construction of administrative court system in our country must be based on the reality of our country and draw lessons from the successful experiences of foreign countries. In nature, the administrative court should be the state judicial organ under the Supreme people's Court. The administrative court shall exercise its administrative jurisdiction independently, and no organ, organization or individual may interfere in the judicial activities of the administrative court except under the supervision of the Supreme Court. The administrative court adjudicates administrative dispute cases according to the legal procedure. There is only supervision and supervision relationship between the upper and lower administrative courts, and there is no leadership relationship, and the administrative court is independent from the local power organs and administrative organs at all levels. This article consists of five parts, the third and fourth chapters as the core content. This paper focuses on the theoretical basis, mode selection and some ideas of the construction of the administrative court system in China. Part one: introduction. It mainly includes the basis of topic selection, research methods and significance, the main innovation of the article and other basic content. Part II: an overview of the Administrative Court. Through the content of this chapter, the concept of administrative court is defined, the characteristics of administrative court are summarized, and different administrative trial organization modes are summarized. On the basis of full comparison, the mode that should be adopted in the reform of administrative trial system in our country is selected. The third part, the Chinese and foreign administrative court system brief description. Through the content of this chapter, the administrative court system in different geographical areas is elaborated separately to explain the characteristics of foreign administrative court system and to clarify the evolution process of administrative court system in our country at the same time. The fourth part: our country constructs the administrative court system theory demonstration. Through the content of this chapter, this paper expounds the theoretical dispute about the construction of administrative court in our country, and analyzes the necessity and feasibility of constructing administrative court system in our country. The fifth part, our country administrative court system design. It includes the relevant factors and mode choice that should be considered in the construction of administrative court in our country. At the same time, it outlines the grand plan for the establishment of administrative court system in our country from the aspects of administrative court organization system, the scope of accepting cases, the jurisdiction of administrative court, and so on. Finally, on the basis of summarizing the content of this paper, we describe the vision of the development of administrative court system in China.
【学位授予单位】:四川师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D925.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭腾云;;论民国行政法院土地案件的裁判[J];沧桑;2010年04期
2 王勇亮;;法国国家行政法院的工作程序[J];国外法学;1988年06期
3 ;法行政法院对超凤凰快堆的判决[J];国外核新闻;1997年04期
4 陈党;;法、德两国行政法院制度之比较[J];中共郑州市委党校学报;2002年06期
5 李世秋;论我国建立独立行政法院的必要性[J];中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2003年S2期
6 段书臣,杨成;试论我国行政法院制度建构[J];广东行政学院学报;2003年06期
7 陈娟;法国行政法院及对我国的启示[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2005年04期
8 宋智敏;;论我国行政法院制度的建构[J];湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版);2006年01期
9 许兵;;试论法国的行政法院[J];中国司法;2007年05期
10 杨伟东;;建立行政法院的构想及其疏漏[J];广东社会科学;2008年03期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 罗水平;刘爱良;;论行政法院设立的必然逻辑——一个制度变迁的分析框架[A];全国法院第25届学术讨论会获奖论文集:公正司法与行政法实施问题研究(下册)[C];2013年
2 李艳华;;法兰西司法风格[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——多元的法律文化[C];2006年
3 李永然;陈宜鸿;;陆资来台纷争解决的相关法律问题[A];赣台法学论坛文集——江西省犯罪学研究会年会(2011年)[C];2011年
4 李震山;;论国家考试与司法救济[A];大学自治、自律与他律[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 武楠;法院内部应设立行政法院[N];法制日报;2003年
2 杨立新;澳门行政法院见闻[N];检察日报;2002年
3 国家检察官学院 迟晓燕;法国初审行政法院[N];检察日报;2007年
4 王菁 国务院机关事务管理局;“行政法之母国”:法国的行政法院[N];中国社会科学报;2011年
5 教授、博士生导师 中南大学法学院院长 陈云良;须尽快设立独立的行政法院[N];法制日报;2014年
6 本社记者 叶俊;马怀德:设立行政法院刻不容缓[N];民主与法制时报;2014年
7 李克杰;独立的行政法院系统值得期待[N];检察日报;2007年
8 王俊杰;独立的行政法院系统值得期待[N];民主与法制时报;2007年
9 谢海洲共青团金平区委;我国设立行政法院可行性分析[N];汕头日报;2009年
10 记者 陈菲;建议设立行政法院[N];新华每日电讯;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张玲;论我国行政法院的建立[D];山西大学;2015年
2 李真真;我国设立行政法院的模式选择与制度研究[D];江西师范大学;2015年
3 刘芬;我国行政法院设立问题研究[D];华南理工大学;2016年
4 马超;我国行政法院的设立研究[D];海南大学;2016年
5 龙伟;论中国行政法院制度之构建[D];四川师范大学;2016年
6 李宏茂;论行政法院在中国之构建[D];电子科技大学;2010年
7 王鑫;我国设立行政法院的刍议[D];延边大学;2006年
8 曹李婷;论我国行政法院制度的构建[D];中国海洋大学;2012年
9 马松文;行政法院制度研究[D];兰州大学;2014年
10 甄思宇;论我国行政法院制度之构建[D];上海师范大学;2015年
,本文编号:2136105
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2136105.html