民事社会科学证据的中国图景

发布时间：2018-07-21 21:33

【摘要】：司法证明方法从神证到人证再到物证,呈现科学化发展的趋势,科学证据成为司法证明方法的必然选择,以社会调查为主要方法的新型诉讼证明方法逐步被应用于诉讼实践。社会科学证据符合客观性、关联性、合法性等证据属性,应赋予社会科学调查报告以法定的证据资格,并将其界定为鉴定意见。社会科学证据频现于我国诉讼实践中,但由于规则缺失,法院对待社会科学证据的态度差异较大。社会科学证据制度在我国的建立,应确定其法律依据,对社会科学证据鉴定机构、鉴定人员及技术标准实行统一管理;应限制法院决定是否同意社会调查的自由裁量权,赋予当事人程序性救济权,对重新调查程序的启动予以具体化规定;应建立技术性出庭制度、法官技术顾问及专家陪审制度等。
[Abstract]:The method of judicial proof, from divine witness to human witness to material evidence, presents a trend of scientific development. Scientific evidence becomes the inevitable choice of judicial proof method, and a new type of lawsuit proof method with social investigation as the main method is gradually applied to litigation practice. Social science evidence accords with objectivity, relevance, legitimacy and other evidential attributes, so it should be assigned to social science investigation report with legal evidence qualification, and be defined as appraisal opinion. Social science evidence frequently appears in our country's litigation practice, but because of the lack of rules, the court's attitude towards social science evidence is quite different. The establishment of social science evidence system in China should be based on its legal basis, unified administration of social science evidence appraisal institutions, appraisers and technical standards, and restriction of the discretion of the court to decide whether to agree with social investigation. The procedural relief right is given to the party concerned, and the initiation of the reinvestigation procedure is specified, and the system of technical court appearance, judge technical adviser and expert jury system should be established.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;安阳师范学院政法学院;
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】