民事诉讼审前程序功能的实现
发布时间：2018-07-25 10:13
【摘要】：在英美法系国家的民事诉讼程序中，审前程序具有举足轻重的地位，与庭审程序并列成为现代民事纠纷解决的两大途径。民事审前程序在我国还处于发展的萌芽期，只是庭审程序前的准备阶段，更谈不上成为解决纠纷的独立程序。随着社会的变革纠纷的增加，法院的诉讼压力与日俱增。本着提高诉讼效率、节约诉讼成本的理念，对我国审前程序的功能进行重构，以实现经济诉讼、公正司法的宏观目标。 审前程序的核心功能是争点整理、证据固定，以实现纠纷解决审前化和庭审程序集中化的双重现实司法目标。这就要求审前程序高度独立于庭审程序而存在，在此基础上对争点整理功能、证据固定功能的重构才能发挥出纠纷解决审前化的有效作用。通过对英美法系国家和大陆法系国家不同司法理念下审前程序的规定，运用比较研究的方法进行分析论证，在借鉴国外成熟经验的基础上，结合我国司法实务现状以实现审前程序的功能在诉讼中的巨大作用。在一定程度上缓解法院的诉讼压力，同时最大限度保障当事人的诉讼权利和实体权益。最终达到高效、经济和公正的解决民事纠纷这一宏观司法目标。
[Abstract]:In the civil procedure of Anglo-American legal system, pretrial procedure plays an important role, and it is the two main ways of modern civil dispute resolution. Civil pretrial procedure is still in the embryonic stage of development in our country. It is only the preparation stage before the trial procedure, let alone the independent procedure for resolving disputes. With the increase of social change and disputes, the pressure of court litigation is increasing day by day. Based on the idea of improving the efficiency of litigation and saving the cost of litigation, this paper reconstructs the function of our country's pretrial procedure in order to realize the macroscopic goal of economic litigation and just administration of justice. The core function of pretrial procedure is to collate the points and fix the evidence in order to realize the dual realistic judicial goal of dispute resolution and trial procedure centralization. This requires that the pretrial procedure is highly independent of the trial procedure, and on this basis, the function of collating the points of contention and the reconstruction of the fixed function of evidence can play an effective role in dispute resolution. Through the provisions of pretrial procedure under different judicial concepts in Anglo-American law system countries and civil law countries, and using the method of comparative study to analyze and demonstrate, on the basis of drawing lessons from the mature experience of foreign countries, In order to realize the function of pretrial procedure, the judicial practice in our country plays an important role in litigation. At the same time, the litigant rights and substantive rights and interests of the parties are protected as much as possible. Finally, to achieve an efficient, economic and fair settlement of civil disputes this macro-judicial goal.
【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.18
本文编号：2143492
[Abstract]:In the civil procedure of Anglo-American legal system, pretrial procedure plays an important role, and it is the two main ways of modern civil dispute resolution. Civil pretrial procedure is still in the embryonic stage of development in our country. It is only the preparation stage before the trial procedure, let alone the independent procedure for resolving disputes. With the increase of social change and disputes, the pressure of court litigation is increasing day by day. Based on the idea of improving the efficiency of litigation and saving the cost of litigation, this paper reconstructs the function of our country's pretrial procedure in order to realize the macroscopic goal of economic litigation and just administration of justice. The core function of pretrial procedure is to collate the points and fix the evidence in order to realize the dual realistic judicial goal of dispute resolution and trial procedure centralization. This requires that the pretrial procedure is highly independent of the trial procedure, and on this basis, the function of collating the points of contention and the reconstruction of the fixed function of evidence can play an effective role in dispute resolution. Through the provisions of pretrial procedure under different judicial concepts in Anglo-American law system countries and civil law countries, and using the method of comparative study to analyze and demonstrate, on the basis of drawing lessons from the mature experience of foreign countries, In order to realize the function of pretrial procedure, the judicial practice in our country plays an important role in litigation. At the same time, the litigant rights and substantive rights and interests of the parties are protected as much as possible. Finally, to achieve an efficient, economic and fair settlement of civil disputes this macro-judicial goal.
【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.18
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冯文生;争点整理程序研究[J];法律适用;2005年02期
2 陈希;;民事诉讼审前程序的独立地位——兼议审前程序的目的、任务与功能[J];法学杂志;2006年05期
3 程兵;;论我国民事诉讼审前程序的完善[J];法学杂志;2009年04期
4 ;最高人民法院第一审经济纠纷案件适用普通程序开庭审理的若干规定[J];中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报;1994年01期
5 ;最高人民法院关于民事经济审判方式改革问题的若干规定[J];中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报;1998年03期
6 ;最高人民法院关于印发《人民法院五年改革纲要》的通知[J];中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报;1999年06期
7 冯玉军;法律经济分析的理论前提[J];甘肃理论学刊;2000年03期
8 杨晓迪;;合理建构我国民事诉讼审前程序之比较研究[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2007年08期
9 占善刚;完善民事诉讼审前准备程序之构想[J];现代法学;2000年01期
10 赵泽君;;民事争点整理程序的合理性基础及其建构[J];现代法学;2008年02期
，本文编号：2143492
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2143492.html
