审前重复供述的排除问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-26 13:06

【摘要】：在非法证据排除规则确立后,审前重复供述的排除问题浮出水面。从确保非法证据排除规则有效实施、消极的实证真实发现主义、人权保障以及遏制刑讯的角度看,审前重复供述应该排除。非法取证行为的持续影响效力理论是排除审前重复供述的依据,排除审前重复供述的标准是刑讯逼供等非法行为与重复供述之间存在因果关系。具体来说,排除重复供述,需要有刑讯逼供等非法取供行为,且该行为对被追诉人产生了较大影响,使其供述自由受到了较大限制。排除非法口供后,可反驳地推定重复供述不具有可采性。控方如欲使用重复供述,需要证明不存在因果关系。排除重复供述可能会遇到诸多障碍,需要通过法官独立司法维护司法公正。
[Abstract]:After the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence is established, the elimination of repeated confessions before trial surfaced. From the point of view of ensuring the effective implementation of the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence, negative positivist truth-discovery doctrine, human rights protection and the containment of torture, repeated confessions before trial should be excluded. The theory of the continuous effect of illegal evidence collection is the basis of excluding repeated confessions before trial, and the criterion of excluding repeated confessions before trial is the causality between illegal acts such as extorting confessions by torture and repeated confessions. Specifically, the exclusion of repeated confessions requires illegal confession taking, such as extorting confessions by torture, and this behavior has a greater impact on the prosecution, which limits their freedom of confession. After excluding illegal confessions, a rebuttal presumption that repeated confessions are not admissible. If the prosecution wants to use repeated statements, it needs to prove that there is no causation. Eliminating repeated confessions may meet many obstacles, and it is necessary to maintain judicial justice through the independent judiciary of judges.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;重庆市高级人民法院刑一庭;
【基金】：2011年度国家社科基金项目“中国地方性刑事司法规则研究”(编号:11BFX124) 2013年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“检察环节证据合法性审查问题研究”(编号:GJ2013D16)
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】