论法院难以排除非法证据的深层次困境

发布时间：2018-07-31 11:57

【摘要】：尽管我国非法证据排除规则在技术上日臻完善,但是影响其贯彻落实的运行环境并未发生根本改变。就刑事庭审的功能而言,我们很难为非法证据排除规则找到用武之地。一方面,我国独有的公检法关系以及以审前程序为重心的刑事诉讼结构从根本上决定了辩护方很难通过申请排除非法证据来彻底颠覆检察机关的指控。即使辩护方偶尔通过强有力的证据促使法院排除非法证据,也难以改变被告人最终被定罪的命运。另一方面,在法庭调查流于形式而且审理与裁判相分离的情况下,再加上刑事审判对事实真相的过度追求,被寄予厚望的非法证据排除规则仍然有可能像以往那样,再次无法逃脱名存实亡的尴尬境地。
[Abstract]:Although the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in our country is becoming more and more perfect in technology, the operating environment which affects its implementation has not changed fundamentally. As far as the function of criminal trial is concerned, it is difficult to find opportunities for the exclusion of illegal evidence. On the one hand, the unique relationship among the Public Security Bureau, the procuratorate, the court and the criminal procedure structure focusing on the pretrial procedure fundamentally determines that it is difficult for the defense to subvert the prosecution's charges by applying for the exclusion of illegal evidence. Even if the defense occasionally uses strong evidence to force the court to rule out illegal evidence, it will hardly change the defendant's eventual conviction. On the other hand, in cases where court investigations are mere formality and the trial is separate from the decision, coupled with the excessive pursuit of the truth in criminal trials, it is possible that the rules of exclusion of illegal evidence, which have high expectations, may still be as they have been in the past. Again can not escape the embarrassment of surviving.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;
【基金】：2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“刑事程序违法的定量分析”(项目编号:12YJA820069)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】